Sixth Circuit :
USA v. Robert Johnson, Jr.
Karl Kraus, Jr. v. Clark Taylor
McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. Vernie Dotson
Fidel Munoz-Avila v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Keith Dookeran v. Cook County Dissent
Eighth (From site)
121617P.pdf 05/03/2013 United States v. Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1617 and No: 12-1919 U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. District court thoroughly considered the 3553(a) factors at the sentencing hearing, issued a 17-page sentencing memorandum and provided a sufficient explanation for its sentencing decision; district court did not err in denying defendant a reduction for acceptance of responsibility where defendant contested factual statements and nearly all applicable enhancements in the PSR; no error in imposing an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3B1.1(a) for leadership role in the offense; no error in imposing an upward enhancement on the ground the offense level substantially understated the seriousness of the offense; where the government failed to provide documentation with the required specificity and reliability to establish the amount of restitution, the court should have postponed the restitution proceedings for the gathering and presentation of additional evidence; similarly, the district court erred in ordering forfeiture in the limited amount set out in its restitution order; the restitution and forfeiture orders are vacated and remanded for further proceeding regarding the losses the victims sustained and the proceeds defendant gained from the scheme.
136011P.pdf 05/03/2013 David Lynd v. Charles Ries U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 13-6011 U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis [PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Nail and Saladino, Bankruptcy Judges] Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. To the extent Lynd requested the bankruptcy court to deviate from the Code and order that his restitution claim be paid from some source not authorized by the Code, the bankruptcy court was without authority to grant such relief, and the court did not err in denying his request.Ninth:Tenth:Eleventh:Federal:
2013-05-03 12-7089 CAVC ARNOLD PARKS v. SHINSEKI [OPINION] Precedential 2013-05-03 12-7003 CAVC ARNOLD KYHN v. SHINSEKI [OPINION] Precedential 2013-05-03 12-1186 CIT FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. US [OPINION] Precedential Summaries TKMB