Friday, September 23, 2011

Federal Circuit -- CORDANCE CORP. V. AMAZON.COM, INC.

No error in JMOL given lack of proof of prior conception.

Amazon shopping cart system fully anticipated the patented process.

Jury's general verdict should have been upheld by court.

No error in court's construction of "feedback information" in CRM system.


CORDANCE CORP. V. AMAZON.COM, INC.

Eleventh Circuit -- Bender v. Mazda Motor Corporation, et al


Order of remand cannot be examined in a 60(b) motion after the remand has actually occurred.

Bender v. Mazda Motor Corporation, et al

Eleventh Circuit -- Jimmy Ledford v. Shelby Peeples, Jr.

Reissue of parts of earlier opinion after en banc.

Jimmy Ledford v. Shelby Peeples, Jr.

Eleventh Circuit -- Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.

Some of the claims relating to a shipboard sexual assault of employee are covered by the arbitration provision in the employment agreement, some aren't - it's for the court to decide.

Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.

Ninth Circuit -- JOHNNY GONZALES V. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC

State law affords concurrent class-action remedy for FDCPA violations.

Dissent: Statutory language is parallel.

JOHNNY GONZALES V. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC

Ninth Circuit -- USA V. MARIO RIVERA

As deft pleaded to particulars of theft which established it as general fraud, the serious felony counts for the sentencing bump.

USA V. MARIO RIVERA

Ninth Circuit -- CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS V. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE

Burden of cigarette excise tax on sales to non-members of Indian nation does not fall upon the nation.

Concurrence: This would go better if we could perform standard economic analysis.


CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS V. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE

Ninth Circuit -- AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Substantial evidence supports designation of Islamic organization as terrorist.

Where government did not pursue additional mitigation measures after denying access to classified materials related to the decision (e.g. nonsecret summaries of classified information), Matthews v. Eldridge procedural DP violation.

Procedural DP violation in not presenting statement of reasons for decision.

Freezing assets without warrant violated 4A.

Barring speech on behalf of the designated organization (e.g. joint press conference) violates 1A.

AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Ninth Circuit -- USA V. FITCH

Sentencing court's drastic upwards departure from sentencing guidelines (while remaining within statute) on grounds that deft had committed the money laundering - by murdering his wife - upheld.

Dissent: Insufficient proof.

USA V. FITCH

Ninth Circuit -- DUKES V. WAL-MART STORES

Order.

DUKES V. WAL-MART STORES

Seventh Circuit -- Patricia Clarett v. Steven Roberts

 Where plaintiff in civil case preemptively introduces evidence of prior criminal conviction, appeal is waived on admissibility.

Police officer's testimony on tasering did not cross the line into expert testimony.

Excessive force instruction did not conflate plaintiff's false arrest claim with the wrongful force claim.

Three shocks from taser not a per se illicit use of force.

Patricia Clarett v. Steven Roberts

Seventh Circuit -- Charles Keller v. USA

Prisoner's habeus claim arguing that vacating of two ACCA predicates warranted resentencing denied, as the court vacating the decisions issued an order subsequent to the habeus filings retracting the earlier order with respect to three of the convictions due to a scriveners error.

Charles Keller v. USA

Seventh Circuit -- Minn-Chem, Incorpora v. Agrium Inco

Complaint alleging potash price fixing insufficiently pleaded to qualify for direct effects exception in Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act.  The Act therefore bars the suit.

Minn-Chem, Incorpora v. Agrium Incorp.

Seventh Circuit -- Bruce A. Williams v. Officer Jason Adams

Pauper plaintiff's inability to pay sanctions incurred by poor filings by contingency counsel is not a justification to dismiss the entire suit.

Bruce A. Williams v. Officer Jason Adams

Sixth Circuit -- L. Daft v. Advest, Inc.

Sufficiency of plan to qualify under ERISA is a question for merits, not a jurisdictional bar.

Merely a colorable claim.

Should have been remanded to Committee after determination that committee's top hat analysis was flawed.

 L. Daft v. Advest, Inc.

Sixth Circuit -- Severe Records, LLC v. John Rich

Sending of a cease and desist letter triggers potential federal jurisdiction under the Copyright Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act.

Artist's transfer of shared copyright interest to new management does not constitute infringement claim for other rights holders in the composition/recording.

Severe Records, LLC v. John Rich

Third Circuit -- USA v. Asya Richardson

Third Circuit sever down at this writing - will fix if it comes back tonight.

USA v. Asya Richardson

Second Circuit -- Barrepski v. Capital One Bank

Claim survives 12(b)(6) under FCRA where bank refuses to adjust credit report after judgment against it where the consumer had not exhausted the bank's grievance procedure.

Mortgage denied based on report = injury.

Barrepski v. Capital One Bank

Second Circuit -- US v. Torres-Rosario

As-applied challenge to felon-in-possession statute TKO'd, as priors were for drug dealing, which is bad and potentially violent.

No error in referring to deft in closing as a drug dealer, as it was a common-sense inference.

Excluded statement useless and harmless.

Subsequent reversal on ACCA predicates justifies vacate & remand in the interest of justice, despite deft stipulating to ACCA priors at sentencing.


US v. Torres-Rosario

First Circuit -- US v. Mitrano

Jury could reasonably have believed that attorney deft willfully avoided challenged, out-of-state child support order. 

On federal sufficiency of the evidence review, state guidelines and caselaw holding that income, not assets, are to be considered is not relevant, as nonpayment of any part of the obligation is sufficient.

No error in willful blindness instruction, despite deft stipulating as to knowledge.

No plain error in calculating sentence based on total arrearage.

US v. Mitrano

Second Circuit -- Chen v. Holder

Asylum application - IJ finding of credibility not outweighed by insufficiency of documentation and supporting testimony.

Chen v. Holder

Federal Circuit -- IN RE SHARED MEMORY GRAPHICS [ORDER]

District Court abused discretion in banning counsel who had formerly worked for codeft of deft in past suit - right to object had been covenanted away.

Dissent: Within discretion.

IN RE SHARED MEMORY GRAPHICS [ORDER]

Federal Circuit -- MONSANTO CO v. BOWMAN

Unmarked seeds in elevator are an insufficiently general commodity to bar patent claim against farmer who plants them.

MONSANTO CO v. BOWMAN

Federal Circuit -- SAMISH INDIAN NATION V. U.S.

The Tribal Priority Allocation system is insufficiently money-mandating to provide jurisdiction under the Tucker Act.

Anti-Deficiency Act does not bar recovery.

SAMISH INDIAN NATION V. U.S.

DC Circuit -- SEC v. Charles Johnson, Jr.

Co-conspirator theory of venue is not available for securities fraud civil enforcement actions under S78(a)

SEC v. Charles Johnson, Jr.

Eleventh Circuit -- Torey McKay v. USA

Where an ACCA predicate no longer obtains because of changes in the caselaw, an actual innocent habeus claim is inapposite.

Legal innocence, not actual innocence.

Torey McKay v. USA

Eleventh Circuit -- Klaus Hofmann v. EMI Resorts, Inc.

Civil RICO consent order was properly consented to.

Klaus Hofmann v. EMI Resorts, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit -- Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. Kingdon of Spain

Wrecked Spanish warship immune from arrest under the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. Kingdon of Spain

Eleventh Circuit -- Douglas Asphalt Co., Joel Spivey, Kyle v. Qore, Inc., et al, Applied technical Serv, Inc.

Contractual and tort claims based on an alleged provision of faulty asphalt.

Douglas Asphalt Co., Joel Spivey, Kyle v. Qore, Inc., et al, Applied technical Serv, Inc.

Tenth Circuit - Note

After the initial day, there's no way of telling from the 10th Circuit website which opinions are precedential.  So, if any of these opinions were precedential, our apologies for not inaccurately summarizing them here.

09/20/2011

Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 10-6239  Yancey vs. Thomas
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 11-9500  Bakanovas vs. Holder, Jr.
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 11-6101  United States vs. Brown


09/21/2011

Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 10-8106  United States vs. Pinon-Ayon
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 10-1538  Roth vs. Green
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 10-4113  Abbott vs. Mulligan
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 11-6210  In re: Rains vs.
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 10-6238  Bishop vs. Franklin
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 11-1336  Pinkey vs. Zavislan

Ninth Circuit -- GOPETS LTD. V. EDWARD HISE

Even though domain name was registered five years before the business was founded, re-registration violated anti-cybersquatting legislation.

GOPETS LTD. V. EDWARD HISE

Ninth Circuit -- STEVEN PRELLWITZ V. D. SISTO

No appellate jurisdiction over District Court order to hold new parole hearing.

Insufficiently final, as it did not order release as penalty for not holding hearing.


STEVEN PRELLWITZ V. D. SISTO

Ninth Circuit -- HUBERT COLE V. ERIC HOLDER, JR.

BIA gave insufficient consideration to the possibility of torture upon return to Honduras.


Dissent: Majority reweighs the facts & substitutes their judgement for that of the agency.


HUBERT COLE V. ERIC HOLDER, JR.

Nonth Circuit -- SANTIAGO LOPEZ V. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION

Errata.


SANTIAGO LOPEZ V. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION

Ninth Circuit -- FATHER M V. VARIOUS TORT CLAIMANTS

Bankruptcy court did not err in ordering disclosure of a name of an active priest suspected of abuse; error in ordering disclosure of retired priest's name.

FATHER M V. VARIOUS TORT CLAIMANTS

Ninth Circuit -- SYLVESTER MAYA V. CENTEX CORPORATION

Homeowners have standing to claim that developers knowingly sold homes to people who were incapable of paying for them, thereby decreasing the economic value and desirability of the plaintiffs' homes.

SYLVESTER MAYA V. CENTEX CORPORATION

Ninth Circuit -- USA V. KEVIN DUGAN

No constitutional bar to criminalizing possession of guns by drug users.

USA V. KEVIN DUGAN

Ninth Circuit -- DIANA KOLEV V. PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, IN

Skidmore-ish deference to FTC finding that pre-dispute mandatory arbitration provisions in Warranty Act not mandatory.

Dissent: I wouldn't do that if I were you.


DIANA KOLEV V. PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, IN
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.

Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.

Author's SSRN page here.