Substantial evidence supports designation of Islamic organization as terrorist.
Where government did not pursue additional mitigation measures after denying access to classified materials related to the decision (e.g. nonsecret summaries of classified information), Matthews v. Eldridge procedural DP violation.
Procedural DP violation in not presenting statement of reasons for decision.
Freezing assets without warrant violated 4A.
Barring speech on behalf of the designated organization (e.g. joint press conference) violates 1A.
AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(312)
FRCP
(279)
Administrative Law
(219)
Crim
(211)
FRE
(135)
Immigration
(131)
Fourth Amendment
(121)
S1983
(114)
Discrimination
(112)
Habeas
(107)
Contract Interpretation
(103)
Intellectual Property
(85)
Labor/Employment
(84)
Bankruptcy
(78)
Prisoner Litigation
(74)
Ineffective Assistance
(62)
Jury Instructions
(57)
AEDPA
(54)
Free Speech
(54)
Class Actions
(51)
Errata
(47)
Legal Ethics
(47)
Standing
(47)
Sufficient Evidence
(47)
ERISA
(44)
Tax
(44)
Securities
(41)
Circuit Split
(39)
Torts - General
(39)
Arbitration
(37)
FRCrimP
(37)
Conflict of laws
(34)
Statute of Limitations
(33)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(30)
Fees
(28)
Miranda
(27)
Conspiracy
(26)
Preemption
(26)
International Law
(25)
Sovereign Immunity
(23)
Religion
(22)
Communications /Computers
(19)
Jury Selection
(19)
Announcements
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(17)
ACCA
(16)
Antitrust
(15)
Environmental
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Speedy Trial
(14)
Brady
(12)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
Souter
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Mootness
(10)
SSA
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(9)
Short Form
(9)
Election Law
(8)
Takings
(8)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Abstention
(4)
Military
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
RICO
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Category tags above cover slip opinions 7/2011-10/2011; 11/2012 - present, give or take a few days. Notably non-comprehensive in scope. Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
NB: Tag categories are added on an ad hoc basis - recently added ones will therefore have fewer cases than one might think. In general, this is quick work -- not every case gets the tags that a committee of 50 scholars would assign it after a week's worth of debate. Do not rely, supra.
NB: Tag categories are added on an ad hoc basis - recently added ones will therefore have fewer cases than one might think. In general, this is quick work -- not every case gets the tags that a committee of 50 scholars would assign it after a week's worth of debate. Do not rely, supra.
Author's SSRN page here.
Slip Opinions For:
Friday, September 23, 2011
Ninth Circuit -- AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Labels:
Administrative Law,
Fourth Amendment,
Free Speech