No error in refusal to give entrapment instruction, as little inducement; nor in denial of entrpament by estoppel, as no one in authority had authorized him to do a one-man-sting.
No error in exclusion of taped conversation for hearsay.
Deft intentionally possessed the drugs.
USA v. Archie Stallworth
Tuesday, September 06, 2011
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Archie Stallworth
Seventh Circuit -- Wells Fargo Bank, Na v. Lake of th
When a security indenture for a corporation owned by a sovereign Indian tribe is voided for lack of prior federal agency approval, the waiver of sovereign immunity in the indenture is also voided, leaving the District Court with no subject matter jurisdiction.
Remanded for determination of whether supporting documents evince waiver.
Wells Fargo Bank, Na v. Lake of the Torches Economic Development Corporation
Remanded for determination of whether supporting documents evince waiver.
Wells Fargo Bank, Na v. Lake of the Torches Economic Development Corporation
Labels:
Administrative Law,
Sovereign Immunity,
Tribe Law
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Tomas Leiskunas
No abuse of discretion in sentencing court's rejection of substantial assistance sentence adjustment.
Insufficient explanation of loss figures in mortgage fraud scheme.
Necessary players can be minor players for sentencing purposes.
Repetition of a minor act doesn't necessarily bar it from being a minor act.
USA v. Tomas Leiskunas
Insufficient explanation of loss figures in mortgage fraud scheme.
Necessary players can be minor players for sentencing purposes.
Repetition of a minor act doesn't necessarily bar it from being a minor act.
USA v. Tomas Leiskunas
Seventh Circuit -- Magnus Norinder v. Sharon Fuentes
No clear error in holding that a place the family moved to when the child was five months old is their habitual residence.
No abuse of discretion in District Court's expedited discovery schedule.
No abuse of discretion in the award of fees.
Magnus Norinder v. Sharon Fuentes
No abuse of discretion in District Court's expedited discovery schedule.
No abuse of discretion in the award of fees.
Magnus Norinder v. Sharon Fuentes
Seventh Circuit -- Jeffery Paul v. Helen Marberry
Dismissals of prisoner's unintelligible claims without prejudice cannot be interpreted as strikes, as the prisoner had no notice that strikes were accumulating.
Jeffery Paul v. Helen Marberry
Jeffery Paul v. Helen Marberry
Sixth Circuit -- PT Pukuafu Indah v. United States Securities and E
Insufficient minimum contacts for personal jurisdiction.
Rule 11 sanctions reversed, as grounds were outside the motion to sanciton -- sanctioned counsel did not have adequate notice.
PT Pukuafu Indah v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 11 sanctions reversed, as grounds were outside the motion to sanciton -- sanctioned counsel did not have adequate notice.
PT Pukuafu Indah v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Fourth Circuit -- Jiali Tang v. Synutra International, Inc.
If you're Chinese, and while in China are injured by milk made in China, forum non conveniens means that you shouldn't file suit in Maryland.
Forum non conveniens not limited to judicial remedies - victim fund is adequate remedy.
Jiali Tang v. Synutra International, Inc.
Forum non conveniens not limited to judicial remedies - victim fund is adequate remedy.
Jiali Tang v. Synutra International, Inc.
Fourth Circuit -- Ceres Marine Terminals v. Robert Green
When the evidence in a benefits hearing is equally balanced, the claimant must lose.
Ceres Marine Terminals v. Robert Green
Ceres Marine Terminals v. Robert Green
Third Circuit -- Glenn Gates v. Rohm & Haas Co
Friday, September 02, 2011
Eleventh Circuit -- Randall Bingham v. Darlene Thomas
Prisoner denied dental care attempted to exhaust administrative remedies - summary judgment was inappropriate.
No due process violation in not giving prisoner a rulebook so that he might understand administrative remedies.
No due process violation in not giving prisoner a rulebook so that he might understand administrative remedies.
Randall Bingham v. Darlene Thomas
Eleventh Circuit -- Knights Armament Co. v. Omnitech Partners
Vacate & remand as per Scotus.
Knights Armament Co. v. Omnitech Partners
Eleventh Circuit -- Knights Armament Co. v. Omnitech Partners
Trade secret misappropriation SOL ran from rumors in industry, not formal unveiling at trade show.
Mark is descriptive.
Mark is descriptive.
Knights Armament Co. v. Omnitech Partners
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Perez-Jiminez
Prisoner's possession of shanks is a crime of violence for sentencing purposes.
Fine not unreasonable.
United States v. Perez-Jiminez
Fine not unreasonable.
United States v. Perez-Jiminez
Ninth Circuit -- R.R. STREET & CO. INC. V. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
No error in prudential dismissal of federal declaratory judgment action in favor of pending state action on same merits; no error in dismissal of federal action in favor of state action where federal action risks piecemeal solution.
Rooker-Feldman doesn't apply, as there is no final state court judgment.
R.R. STREET & CO. INC. V. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Rooker-Feldman doesn't apply, as there is no final state court judgment.
R.R. STREET & CO. INC. V. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Ninth Circuit -- GERALD SAMUELS V. HOLLAND AMERICAN LINE--USA INC
No duty to warn on the part of cruise line where the passenger was injured at a non-notorious beach adjacent to the mooring.
GERALD SAMUELS V. HOLLAND AMERICAN LINE--USA INC
GERALD SAMUELS V. HOLLAND AMERICAN LINE--USA INC
Ninth Circuit -- TERESITA COSTELLO V. JANET NAPOLITANO
Chevron deference to BIA ruling that overseas minor children (of US legal residents) who attain majority prior to completion of petition are ineligible to join their parents under statute.
TERESITA COSTELLO V. JANET NAPOLITANO
TERESITA COSTELLO V. JANET NAPOLITANO
Ninth Circuit - PAYTON V. CULLEN
Death penalty habeus - No ineffective assistance in mitigation phase.
Brady violation would not have swayed the verdict (witness who testified to deft's confession falsely testified that he had not been working for the police)
No ineffective assistance in mitigation for PTSD claim.
No errors, so no cumulative error.
[Thou shalt not kill. -TMB]
PAYTON V. CULLEN
Brady violation would not have swayed the verdict (witness who testified to deft's confession falsely testified that he had not been working for the police)
No ineffective assistance in mitigation for PTSD claim.
No errors, so no cumulative error.
[Thou shalt not kill. -TMB]
PAYTON V. CULLEN
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Chane Christenson
Inflammatory political rhetoric in website post/ email does not exculpate deft from threat to kill the President.
Unconditional guilty plea can be reviewed for support in the factual record.
United States v. Chane Christenson
Unconditional guilty plea can be reviewed for support in the factual record.
United States v. Chane Christenson
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Justin Thompson
No abuse of discretion in sentence limiting child pr0n deft's interactions with minors.
Delegation of decisions to probation officer not an impermissible delegation of judicial authority.
Ban on having adult pr0n not abuse of discretion or unconstitutionally broad/vague.
United States v. Justin Thompson
Delegation of decisions to probation officer not an impermissible delegation of judicial authority.
Ban on having adult pr0n not abuse of discretion or unconstitutionally broad/vague.
United States v. Justin Thompson
Eighth Circuit -- Domingo Eugenio Lopez-Gabriel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr
Race-based stop was an insufficiently egregious violation of 4A/5A to justify the exclusion of evidence in an immigration proceeding.
Domingo Eugenio Lopez-Gabriel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr
Domingo Eugenio Lopez-Gabriel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Juan Delgado
Proof did not vary from indictment - a single conspiracy was proved, not multiple ones.
Sufficient evidence.
United States v. Juan Delgado
Sufficient evidence.
United States v. Juan Delgado
Eighth Circuit -- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. WMR e-PIN, LLC
For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a national bank is a citizen only of the home state where its main office is located.
Injunctive relief by arbitrator was kosher.
In a trade secrets arbitration, inquiry into patent inventions is permissible.
Abuse of discretion in not amending injunction to remove prohibitions on use of ideas which became public-domain during the pendency of the action.
Dissent: Principal place of business, not head office governs.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. WMR e-PIN, LLC
Injunctive relief by arbitrator was kosher.
In a trade secrets arbitration, inquiry into patent inventions is permissible.
Abuse of discretion in not amending injunction to remove prohibitions on use of ideas which became public-domain during the pendency of the action.
Dissent: Principal place of business, not head office governs.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. WMR e-PIN, LLC
Eighth Circuit -- Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Mike Rounds
Abortion advisories generally upheld.
Human being advisory doesn't substantially limit access to abortion.
Relationship advisories (prevention of forced abortion) are constitutional.
Suicide advisory violates due process and docs' free speech.
General medical risks constitutional.
Concur/dissent - Suicide advisory justified.
Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Mike Rounds
Human being advisory doesn't substantially limit access to abortion.
Relationship advisories (prevention of forced abortion) are constitutional.
Suicide advisory violates due process and docs' free speech.
General medical risks constitutional.
Concur/dissent - Suicide advisory justified.
Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Mike Rounds
Eighth Circuit -- Elliot Kaplan v. Mayo Clinic
Admission of entire patient file - which contained 54 mentions of insurance - and not giving limiting instruction was harmless error.
No error in admission of medical photos without clear chain of custody - putative manipulation is mere speculation.
No plain error in not mentioning doctor by name in jury instruction.
Doc should have done the biopsy - contract claim can go to trial.
Elliot Kaplan v. Mayo Clinic
No error in admission of medical photos without clear chain of custody - putative manipulation is mere speculation.
No plain error in not mentioning doctor by name in jury instruction.
Doc should have done the biopsy - contract claim can go to trial.
Elliot Kaplan v. Mayo Clinic
Seventh Circuit -- Edgenet, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A
Copying of licensed taxonomy to internal systems as preparation for developing a proprietary system did not violate the Copyright Act.
Edgenet, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A
Edgenet, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A
Seventh Circuit -- Basil Frye v. Thompson Steel Company
Offsetting pension remuneration by workman's comp. awards for partial permanent disability where Plan allows for offset of awards for permanent disability was not an abuse of discretion.
Basil Frye v. Thompson Steel Company
Basil Frye v. Thompson Steel Company
Sixth Circuit -- Regina Adamski v. Rohm and Haas Pension Plan
Class action settlement on COLA calculations for ERISA lump-sum payouts approved, despite recent decisions in other circuits that make the plaintiff's claim stronger.
Regina Adamski v. Rohm and Haas Pension Plan
Regina Adamski v. Rohm and Haas Pension Plan
Seventh Circuit -- James Breneisen, Jr. v. Motorola
Employer's exacerbation of medical condition is irrelevant to FMLA claim.
Deft's voluntary tender of full claim sans fees (which were in claim) makes the claim moot.
James Breneisen, Jr. v. Motorola
Deft's voluntary tender of full claim sans fees (which were in claim) makes the claim moot.
James Breneisen, Jr. v. Motorola
Seventh Circuit -- Kolbe & Kolbe Health v. Medical College of Wisconsin
ERISA civil action provision cannot be used to recover payments to a non-covered party.
State ERISA common law is not an ERISA mechanism, but a parallel system aimed at the same objectives - therefore dismissal of federal ERISA claim doesn't necessitate dismissal of state claims.
Kolbe & Kolbe Health v. Medical College of Wisconsin
State ERISA common law is not an ERISA mechanism, but a parallel system aimed at the same objectives - therefore dismissal of federal ERISA claim doesn't necessitate dismissal of state claims.
Kolbe & Kolbe Health v. Medical College of Wisconsin
Seventh Circuit -- Dominic Forte v. William A. Brandt
No error in Bankruptcy court holding board member of company to be an insider for purposes of avoiding transfers, despite the fact that the board member was barred from seeing the books.
Dominic Forte v. William A. Brandt
Dominic Forte v. William A. Brandt
Seventh Circuit -- Saad Sarhan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Denial of withholding of removal was error, as Jordanian woman subject to "honor killing" upon return is a member of a particular social group - Jordainian women accused of illicit activities.
No deference to BIA, as nonprecedential finding.
Also references Convention Against Torture.
Saad Sarhan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
No deference to BIA, as nonprecedential finding.
Also references Convention Against Torture.
Saad Sarhan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Labels:
Administrative Law,
Immigration,
International Law
Seventh Circuit -- e360 Insight v. Spamhaus Project
Discovery delays & excessive gamesmanship take the damages from several mil to three bucks.
e360 Insight v. Spamhaus Project
e360 Insight v. Spamhaus Project
Seventh Circuit -- Mark Rodgers v. Jesse White
Jury could reasonably find discrimination given disparate treatment of comparator.
Mark Rodgers v. Jesse White
Mark Rodgers v. Jesse White
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Jake Richardson, III
Drugs found in pat-down during Terry stop might have been a weapon - the police were justified in examining the suspicious lump in the pocket.
Subsequent voluntary statements admissible.
USA v. Jake Richardson, III
Subsequent voluntary statements admissible.
USA v. Jake Richardson, III
Sixth Circuit -- Marcia Bryson v. Middlefield Volunteer Fire Dep't
No independent antecedent remuneration requirement for employee status in Title VII inquiry. (Id est, you ain't got to be paid to be an employee.)
One of many factors in determining agency.
Circuit split flagged with 2.
Marcia Bryson v. Middlefield Volunteer Fire Dep't
One of many factors in determining agency.
Circuit split flagged with 2.
Marcia Bryson v. Middlefield Volunteer Fire Dep't
Sixth Circuit -- Kevin Brown v. David Bobby
No 6A speedy trial violation habeus. AEDPA deference.
Dissent: 584 days, dude.
Kevin Brown v. David Bobby
Dissent: 584 days, dude.
Kevin Brown v. David Bobby
Sixth Circuit -- Reginald Walker v. Greg McQuiggan
Habeus granted on ineffective assistance - counsel did not present insanity defense.
Reginald Walker v. Greg McQuiggan
Reginald Walker v. Greg McQuiggan
Sixth Circuit -- Rodney Cochran v. Dan & Don Gilliam
Police active role in eviction and taking possession of tenant's personalty bars summary judgment for them on qualified immunity.
In addition to effecting the seizure, police bought the tenant's TV from the landlord for $100 to put in the office.
Rodney Cochran v. Dan & Don Gilliam
In addition to effecting the seizure, police bought the tenant's TV from the landlord for $100 to put in the office.
Rodney Cochran v. Dan & Don Gilliam
Sixth Circuit -- Bio-Medical Applications of Tenn v. Central States Southeast and SW
Group health care plan cannot immediately deny coverage to individual diagnosed with kidney disease before becoming eligible for Medicare.
Statutory requirement for demonstrated responsibility on the part of the private plan as an element of the civil private cause of action limits tortfeasors, not contractual parties.
Unclear what is doubled in statutory double damages - remand.
Bio-Medical Applications of Tenn v. Central States Southeast and SW
Statutory requirement for demonstrated responsibility on the part of the private plan as an element of the civil private cause of action limits tortfeasors, not contractual parties.
Unclear what is doubled in statutory double damages - remand.
Bio-Medical Applications of Tenn v. Central States Southeast and SW
Sixth Circuit -- Jose De Jesus Casillas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Federal Courts of Appeal only have jurisdiction over orders of final removal - petitioner's stay of removal, speedy bond hearing are not within court's jurisdiction.
Jose De Jesus Casillas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Jose De Jesus Casillas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Second Circuit -- Collazo v. Pagano
Prisoner claim dismissed because of absolute prosecutorial immunity counts as a frivolous litigation strike under S1915.
Collazo v. Pagano
Collazo v. Pagano
Second Circuit -- Dyncorp v. Dir., OWCP
Symptoms of PTSD, changing work assignments, and counseling are not evidence sufficient to establish knowledge of psychological incapacity for purposes of assessing the accrual date of the Longshoreman's Act Statute of Limitations.
Dyncorp v. Dir., OWCP
Dyncorp v. Dir., OWCP
Federal Circuit -- HARARI V. LEE
Thus, the dispute is whether the ’579 application’s description of margining and biasing a master reference cell relative to a local reference cell provides written description support for the offset erase verify bias claims. We decline to resolve this technical, fact-intensive question in the first instance, and instead vacate and remand to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. . .
Moreover, accessing multiple bit lines simultaneously with a multiplexer is not accessing a single bit line. Similarly, calling multiple bit lines a “composite bit line” as Harari does in its briefs does not make it so. Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s decision granting Lee’s threshold motion alleging unpatentability for lack of written description and its judgment on priority against Harari
HARARI V. LEE
Moreover, accessing multiple bit lines simultaneously with a multiplexer is not accessing a single bit line. Similarly, calling multiple bit lines a “composite bit line” as Harari does in its briefs does not make it so. Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s decision granting Lee’s threshold motion alleging unpatentability for lack of written description and its judgment on priority against Harari
HARARI V. LEE
Tenth Circuit -- Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins
Class of one Equal Protection claim insufficiently pleaded under Twombly.
Gov't had discretion to send nuisance letter.
Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins
Gov't had discretion to send nuisance letter.
Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins
Ninth Circuit -- JONATHAN ALVAREZ V. CHEVRON CORPORATION
Class action against gasoline company for nonpremium gas sold at premium prices due to residuum in pump from prior customer was properly dismissed, as there's no statute or common-law doctrine barring the conduct.
JONATHAN ALVAREZ V. CHEVRON CORPORATION
JONATHAN ALVAREZ V. CHEVRON CORPORATION
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. STACY HUNT
Court erred under Apprendi in sentencing where it calculated possession with intent to distribute without possession having been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
USA V. STACY HUNT
USA V. STACY HUNT
Ninth Circuit -- RAY HRDLICKA V. PERRY RENIFF
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. CHARLES LAFLEY
Ninth Circuit -- LEVI JACKSON V. CHARLES RYAN
Although there was unconstitutional error in trial court's felony murder instruction, remand for assessment of habeus under AEDPA's ineffective assistance criteria.
LEVI JACKSON V. CHARLES RYAN
LEVI JACKSON V. CHARLES RYAN
Labels:
Habeas,
Ineffective Assistance,
Jury Instructions
Ninth Circuit -- LI V. HOLDER
Petitioner's method of illegal entry was so dangerous to himself that it justifies deportation.
Court has jurisdiction after denial of relief but during pendency of DHS background checks
LI V. HOLDER
Court has jurisdiction after denial of relief but during pendency of DHS background checks
LI V. HOLDER
Ninth Circuit -- ELIN PHIFER V. ICELANDAIR
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Patricia Brown
Victim's age is a sentencing factor, not an Apprendi element that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Seeing brass knuckles and knife in flashlight beam through car window was sufficient probable cause for officer to search car.
No error in not severing assault from murder, as evidence of either would have been admissible in trial of the other.
United States v. Patricia Brown
Seeing brass knuckles and knife in flashlight beam through car window was sufficient probable cause for officer to search car.
No error in not severing assault from murder, as evidence of either would have been admissible in trial of the other.
United States v. Patricia Brown
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Azureeiah O'Connor
Evidence in record establishes that there was no Speedy Trial Act violation, as judge issued continuance for kosher reasons, although not formally placing them in the record until later.
No 6A speedy trial violation, as deft was responsible for much of the delay.
Joint venture instruction challenge waived, as trial counsel agreed to instruction.
Sufficient evidence.
No surplussage in indictment.
USA v. Azureeiah O'Connor
No 6A speedy trial violation, as deft was responsible for much of the delay.
Joint venture instruction challenge waived, as trial counsel agreed to instruction.
Sufficient evidence.
No surplussage in indictment.
USA v. Azureeiah O'Connor
Seventh Circuit -- Nature Conservancy v. Wilder
Laches defense to claim for damages for breach (rather firmly) denied for lack of proof of prejudice.
Nature Conservancy v. Wilder
Nature Conservancy v. Wilder
Thursday, September 01, 2011
Seventh Circuit -- Juan Torres-Tristan v. Eric Holder,
Circuit Courts do not have jurisdiction to review denial of U-Visas (issued for cooperating with criminal investigations).
Juan Torres-Tristan v. Eric Holder,
Juan Torres-Tristan v. Eric Holder,
Seventh Circuit -- Christian Arroyo v. USA
FTCA claim not time-barred, as SOL accrued upon subjective discovery of injury, within range of objectively reasonable time-frame for discovery.
Poz: extended special concurrence / accrual dicta
Christian Arroyo v. USA
Poz: extended special concurrence / accrual dicta
Christian Arroyo v. USA
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Buruji Kashamu
Foreign magistrate's finding in extradition proceedings that there was insufficient evidence to extradite (as deft's brother might have committed the crimes) does not collaterally estop US from continuing to attempt to extradite him from other nations.
USA v. Buruji Kashamu
USA v. Buruji Kashamu
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. James McKenzie
For sentencing guidelines purposes, the amount of cocaine that the conspiracy tried to steal was the reasonably foreseeable amount, not the agreed upon amount.
USA v. James McKenzie
USA v. James McKenzie
Seventh Circuit -- Pamela Harris v. Pat Quinn
State as employer may require employees to contribute fair share monies to union - no First Amendment violation.
Claims of nonunionized sectors not yet ripe, as the state has not formally demanded such contributions yet.
Pamela Harris v. Pat Quinn
Claims of nonunionized sectors not yet ripe, as the state has not formally demanded such contributions yet.
Pamela Harris v. Pat Quinn
Third Circuit -- Cheikh Diop v. US Immigration and Customs Enf
Statute mandating that removable persons who commit certain crimes must be detained does not justify incarceration for more than two years - 5A Due Process kicks in.
Cheikh Diop v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cheikh Diop v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
First Circuit -- Sterling Merchandising, Inc. v. Nestle SA
No standing for antitrust claim based on speculative market harms where prices fell and supply rose in the near term.
Sterling Merchandising, Inc. v. Nestle SA
Sterling Merchandising, Inc. v. Nestle SA
First Circuit -- Wright v. Marshall
No ineffective assistance in not objecting to witness' adoption of ADA suggestion on direct.
No ineffective assistance in not objecting to certain evidence.
Ni ineffective assistance in not requesting misidentification instruction.
Wright v. Marshall
No ineffective assistance in not objecting to certain evidence.
Ni ineffective assistance in not requesting misidentification instruction.
Wright v. Marshall
First Circuit -- US v. Mubayyid
Government variance from the particular object of the conspiracy alleged in the indictment should not have barred conviction on a narrower conspiracy.
In that the tax fraud question was at most arguably ambiguous, its ambiguity was properly a matter for the jury.
Sufficient evidence for tax convictions.
Gov't had only to prove concealment of either of two facts described in the conjunctive in the indictment. (A double preposition, yes. Moving on.)
Harmless error in admission of phone conversation.
Deft argument that terrorist-type evidence presented to establish conspiracy created a retroactive misjoinder id TKO'd by circuit reversal on conspiracy, above
US v. Mubayyid
US v. Al-Monla
US v. Muntasser
US v. Muntasser
US v. Mubayyid
In that the tax fraud question was at most arguably ambiguous, its ambiguity was properly a matter for the jury.
Sufficient evidence for tax convictions.
Gov't had only to prove concealment of either of two facts described in the conjunctive in the indictment. (A double preposition, yes. Moving on.)
Harmless error in admission of phone conversation.
Deft argument that terrorist-type evidence presented to establish conspiracy created a retroactive misjoinder id TKO'd by circuit reversal on conspiracy, above
US v. Mubayyid
US v. Al-Monla
US v. Muntasser
US v. Muntasser
US v. Mubayyid
Federal Circuit -- CARDIOSOM, L.L.C. V. U.S.
Given ambiguity in shielding statute, Tucker Act jurisdiction remains for suit alleging breach by government.
CARDIOSOM, L.L.C. V. U.S.
CARDIOSOM, L.L.C. V. U.S.
Federal Circuit -- AIA ENGINEERING LTD. V. MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL S/A
Because the district court erred in construing the claim term “solid solution,” and thus erred in determining that the reissued claims impermissibly recaptured surrendered subject matter, we reverse and remand.
AIA ENGINEERING LTD. V. MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL S/A
AIA ENGINEERING LTD. V. MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL S/A
Federal Circuit -- CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC. V. BIOGEN IDEC
Although the presence of a mental step does not in itself DQ the patent, the process must bring the idea to application.
[Again, folks, Patent Law isn't one our strong suits here. And by "strong suits", we mean "things we have the slightest clue about."]
CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC. V. BIOGEN IDEC
[Again, folks, Patent Law isn't one our strong suits here. And by "strong suits", we mean "things we have the slightest clue about."]
CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC. V. BIOGEN IDEC
DC Circuit -- David Bowie v. Charles Maddox
Government employee has no First Amendment basis for refusal to sign an affidavit in an employment discrimination.
Big ol' circuit split.
David Bowie v. Charles Maddox
Big ol' circuit split.
David Bowie v. Charles Maddox
Eleventh Circuit -- Arturo Jose Carrizo vs US Attorney General
Substantial evidence supports Immigration adverse credibility finding.
Arturo Jose Carrizo vs US Attorney General
Tenth Circuit -- Hull v. IRS
IRS properly withheld FOIA information, as the request on its face sought only a third party's return information.
Hull v. IRS
Hull v. IRS
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Irvin
Harmless error in introduction of business record, another record was kosher.
Detailed challenges to sufficiency of evidence and sentencing.
United States v. Irvin
Detailed challenges to sufficiency of evidence and sentencing.
United States v. Irvin
Tenth Circuit -- Mascorro v. Billings
Qualified immunity denied, as no reasonable officer would have thought that pursuit of a minor for a minor traffic offense justified warrantless entry into home.
Mascorro v. Billings
Mascorro v. Billings
Ninth Circuit -- EDWIN LOCKETT V. KEITH ERICSON
4th Amendment S1983 Plaintiff does not have to prove that conviction was reversed where plea was nolo contendre, as the bad search was not an element of conviction.
Appeal waiver in criminal action does not encompass civil claims.
California motor vehicle convictions can't be used for collateral estoppel.
EDWIN LOCKETT V. KEITH ERICSON
Appeal waiver in criminal action does not encompass civil claims.
California motor vehicle convictions can't be used for collateral estoppel.
EDWIN LOCKETT V. KEITH ERICSON
Ninth Circuit -- PEDRO JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR.
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Azizia Peterson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.