35B motion converted to Habeas sua sponte.
Not second/successive, as claim did not become ripe until gov't incorrectly made 35B motion.
BUT time-barred under one-year rule.
USA v. Khaled Obeid
Friday, February 22, 2013
Seventh Circuit -- Northeastern Rural E v. Wabash
Electricity provision contract presents question of state law, not federal law.
Northeastern Rural E v. Wabash
Northeastern Rural E v. Wabash
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Mark Woerner
Good faith exception applies to warrant obtained on the basis of deft statements later determined to be the fruit of an illegal search. Case by case, not categorical.
Sufficient evidence, pr0n counts not multiplicitous.
USA v. Mark Woerner
Sufficient evidence, pr0n counts not multiplicitous.
USA v. Mark Woerner
Fifth Circuit -- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Eland Energy Inc.
Insurer does not breach duty of good faith and fair dealing by settling third party claims on the side to the limit of coverage, despite contractual duty to defend.
Choice of law assigned under interest analysis. Texas wins.
Misrepresentations were not a 'producing cause' of the allegedly tortious settlement offers.
Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Eland Energy Inc., e
Choice of law assigned under interest analysis. Texas wins.
Misrepresentations were not a 'producing cause' of the allegedly tortious settlement offers.
Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Eland Energy Inc., e
Third Circuit -- Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.
Securities Fraud -
Reckless acts by controlling persons do not establish 20a liability.
No negligent supervision by Board, as not foreseeable, not really managers.
No 10b5 claim as insufficient scienter.
(again, very quick skim based on what catches our eye as we scroll. MB)
Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.
Reckless acts by controlling persons do not establish 20a liability.
No negligent supervision by Board, as not foreseeable, not really managers.
No 10b5 claim as insufficient scienter.
(again, very quick skim based on what catches our eye as we scroll. MB)
Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.
Second Circuit -- United States v. Wilson
Where the deft got the Social Security number nonfraudulently but updated it fraudulently, the Number was not acquired fraudulently.
United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson
Second Circuit -- In re: Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC
Even where an investor exerts discretion in how fund invests and intends that the fund invest in a certain (ill-fated) endeavour, they are not customers of the endeavour, as they themselves transacted no business with it.
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Blog Reset
Cutting the Gordian knot of opinion backlog. MB is hitting the "reset button" and, tomorrow, will resume publishing same-day summaries for all Circuits.
MB
MB
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Seventh Circuit -- William Grote, III v. Kathleen Sebelius
Granting of prelim injunction in health care mandate case, brief per curiam.
Long dissent -- closely held corporation is still a fundamentally commercial entity.
William Grote, III v. Kathleen Sebelius
Long dissent -- closely held corporation is still a fundamentally commercial entity.
William Grote, III v. Kathleen Sebelius
Seventh Circuit -- Lock Realty Corporat v. U.S. Health, LP
Despite TKO of sole expert under Daubert, no error in award of liquidated damages even given denial of earlier motion for further discovery. [Maybe.]
Attorney affidavit as to billing properly admitted despite awkward phrasing.
Lock Realty Corporat v. U.S. Health, LP
Attorney affidavit as to billing properly admitted despite awkward phrasing.
Lock Realty Corporat v. U.S. Health, LP
Seventh Circuit -- James Wells v. Jeff Coker
No preclusion/estoppel in subsequent S1983 suit.from earlier Criminal plea. Potentially multiple bases for plea.
James Wells v. Jeff Coker
James Wells v. Jeff Coker
Seventh Circuit -- Ghulam Mustafa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Immigration/Pakistan -- Reversal, as future threat might very well be political animus, not personal.
Ghulam Mustafa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Ghulam Mustafa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Carlos Mendiola
Linguist is not an expert for purposes of voice ID, and can therefore familiarize herself with the voice prior to the ID.
USA v. Carlos Mendiola
USA v. Carlos Mendiola
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Jason Foster
Crack/cocaine adjustment is not a full resentencing, and therefore different statutory minimums don't apply.
USA v. Jason Foster
USA v. Jason Foster
Seventh Circuit -- Central States South v. Stephen L. Messina
Veil pierced upon dissolution of retirement plan agreement, as the entity in question operated under an agreement that said that it was more than just a passive investment vehicle.
Central States South v. Stephen L. Messina
Central States South v. Stephen L. Messina
Seventh Circuit -- Porfirio Gutierrez v. Keith Anglin
Habeas -- Ineffective Assistance denial upheld, as the claim doesn't address the statutory factors of the potentially mitigated offense.
Porfirio Gutierrez v. Keith Anglin
Porfirio Gutierrez v. Keith Anglin
Seventh Circuit -- John Asare Boadi v. Eric Holder, Jr
Immigration -- no unfair surprise when IJ accelerated the calendar on pro se petitioner.
IJ findings upheld.
John Asare Boadi v. Eric Holder, Jr
IJ findings upheld.
John Asare Boadi v. Eric Holder, Jr
Seventh Circuit -- Matthew Thomas v. UBS AG
Dismissal of class action prior to certification -- Poz: Swiss bank had no obligation to tell folks that they had to pay relevant US taxes.
Matthew Thomas v. UBS AG
Matthew Thomas v. UBS AG
Seventh Circuit -- Jurijus Kadamovas v. Michael Stevens
Posner -- Reversal of dismissal of 99-page prisoner pro se complaint for unintelligibility. There's a difference between length and unintelligibility, and Iqbal means that it might take that long to state a claim.
Jurijus Kadamovas v. Michael Stevens
Jurijus Kadamovas v. Michael Stevens
Seventh Circuit -- Hoyt Ray v. Wexford Health Sourc
No cruel & unusual punishment for denial of MRI; no appointment of counsel.
Hoyt Ray v. Wexford Health Sourc
Hoyt Ray v. Wexford Health Sourc
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Adolfo Wren
Court does not have to reset to the statutory minimum when resentencing for crack/cocaine where substantial assistance to authorities moved the original range to beneath the statutory minimum.
USA v. Adolfo Wren
USA v. Adolfo Wren
Seventh Circuit -- Karen Fitzgerald v. M. Santoro
Detention of potential suicide victim -- summary judgment for officers in S1983 action upheld.
Karen Fitzgerald v. M. Santoro
Karen Fitzgerald v. M. Santoro
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Ronald Love
Crinm -- evidence sufficient for cocaine conspiracy;
FRE --- a question doesn't assert anything and is therefore categorically not hearsay.
Remand for sentencing error -- amount of drugs involved in transaction.
USA v. Ronald Love
FRE --- a question doesn't assert anything and is therefore categorically not hearsay.
Remand for sentencing error -- amount of drugs involved in transaction.
USA v. Ronald Love
Seventh Circuit -- Bernard Hawkins v. USA
Posner: Challenge to sentencing guidelines calculation not cognizable review, as the guidelines are now merely advisory.
Dissent: Circuit precedent says that prisoners can challenge career offender status.
Bernard Hawkins v. USA
Dissent: Circuit precedent says that prisoners can challenge career offender status.
Bernard Hawkins v. USA
Site Update
Still slogging through last week's backlog from the hintermost Circuits. Back to nationwide same-day posting Friday, even if we have to cut the Gordian knot and not post a few.
MB
MB
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Sixth Circuit -- James Price v. Bd. of Trs. of the Ind. Laborer's Pension Fund
ERISA -- Plan can amend plan so that amendments are retroactive to earlier injuries.
Dissent, natch.
James Price v. Bd. of Trs. of the Ind. Laborer's Pension Fund
Dissent, natch.
James Price v. Bd. of Trs. of the Ind. Laborer's Pension Fund
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Michael Peppel
When the sentencing range is in the triple digits and the actual sentence is seven days, there's a likely future remand for substantive error in sentence.
Loss correctly calculated.
USA v. Michael Peppel
Loss correctly calculated.
USA v. Michael Peppel
Sixth Circuit -- Aleksandr Yeremin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Trafficking in False Documents is categorically a crime of moral turpitude for Immigration purposes.
Aleksandr Yeremin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Aleksandr Yeremin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Bernard Kurlemann
Concelament of a material fact does not constitute a False Statement under the statute.
Multiple challenges to Bankruptcy Court findings denied.
Sentencing court should have created a new range after acknowledging the Substantial Assistance.
USA v. Bernard Kurlemann
Multiple challenges to Bankruptcy Court findings denied.
Sentencing court should have created a new range after acknowledging the Substantial Assistance.
USA v. Bernard Kurlemann
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Rodrigo Macias-Farias
Brady -- No error in denial of mistrial for government witness not producing in advance a written report referred to in testimony.
District court did not make necessary factual findings for Obstruction, given lack of document listing specific misstatements.
USA v. Rodrigo Macias-Farias
District court did not make necessary factual findings for Obstruction, given lack of document listing specific misstatements.
USA v. Rodrigo Macias-Farias
Sixth Circuit -- Tonia Wright v. Kathryn O'Day
Minor has standing to make procedural due process challenge to placement on offender registry, as harm happens with the listing and the question is ripe.
Tonia Wright v. Kathryn O'Day
Tonia Wright v. Kathryn O'Day
Sixth Circuit -- Douglas Coley v. Margaret Bagley
Death penalty Habeas [thou shalt not kill]
No ineffective assistance for not seeking recusal/removal of judge during penalty phase.
Harmless error in guilt phase when the prosecution shifted theory of the crime as to who actually shot the gun.
No error in not releasing Grand Jury transcript, denying severance.
Douglas Coley v. Margaret Bagley
No ineffective assistance for not seeking recusal/removal of judge during penalty phase.
Harmless error in guilt phase when the prosecution shifted theory of the crime as to who actually shot the gun.
No error in not releasing Grand Jury transcript, denying severance.
Douglas Coley v. Margaret Bagley
Sixth Circuit -- Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Glassman
Where a car dealership contracts with a manufacturer under a state regulatory scheme limiting the proximity of dealerships, subsequent modification of the regulatory scheme is neither retroactively applied to the contractual agreement nor retroactively directly applied to the parties.
Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Glassman
Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Glassman
Sixth Circuit -- Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Kanwal Singh
No Federal Question in controversy over gas pipeline easement -- the Federal statute doesn't create a private right f action, and the state question doesn't involve a significant federal interest.
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Kanwal Singh
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Kanwal Singh
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Arnoldo Gonzalez-Garcia
Physical fruits of Miranda violation not suppressable under Edwards.
Use of unwarned statment to obtain subsequent consent not always coercicive -- holistic multifactor test.
USA v. Arnoldo Gonzalez-Garcia
Use of unwarned statment to obtain subsequent consent not always coercicive -- holistic multifactor test.
USA v. Arnoldo Gonzalez-Garcia
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Jesse Gutierrez
Approval of involuntary medication of deft in order to stand trial.
No need for BOP Haring Officer to directly order the medication -- factual finding that it is indicated is sufficient.
Inability to replicate on the stand the mens rea at time of alleged crime is not a defense to involuntary medication.
USA v. Jesse Gutierrez
No need for BOP Haring Officer to directly order the medication -- factual finding that it is indicated is sufficient.
Inability to replicate on the stand the mens rea at time of alleged crime is not a defense to involuntary medication.
USA v. Jesse Gutierrez
Friday, February 15, 2013
Fifth Circuit -- John Priester, Jr., et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,
Statute of limitations applies to challenges to homestead liens under the Texas Constitution.
Claim accrues at legal injury, not discovery.
John Priester, Jr., et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,
Claim accrues at legal injury, not discovery.
John Priester, Jr., et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,
Fifth Circuit -- Tekelec, Incorporated v. Verint Systems, Incorporated
Corporation has standing to enforce agreement -- basically several arguments on the contract, not Article III.
For purposes of the K, royalties are not royalties when the term is modified by "damages." (i.e. royalties here are a form of patent damages).
Tekelec, Incorporated v. Verint Systems, Incorporated
For purposes of the K, royalties are not royalties when the term is modified by "damages." (i.e. royalties here are a form of patent damages).
Tekelec, Incorporated v. Verint Systems, Incorporated
Fifth Circuit -- Republic of Ecuador, et al v. John Connor, et al
Intervenor corporation cannot block Federal discovery order in international arbitration, as it has argued to its profit elsewhere that the proceeding is an international tribunal and therefore qualifies for such things.
Republic of Ecuador, et al v. John Connor, et al
Republic of Ecuador, et al v. John Connor, et al
Fifth Circuit -- Bobby Smith v. Burl Cain, Warden
Common law limitation on new evidentiary hearings for Habeas challenges does not apply if the Federal court, looking at the state court record, determines that the state court unreasonably applied federal law -- here, in the context of a Batson challenge.
No purposeful discrimination here, mainly for lack of comparators.
Bobby Smith v. Burl Cain, Warden
No purposeful discrimination here, mainly for lack of comparators.
Bobby Smith v. Burl Cain, Warden
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Matthew Moore, et al
Crim -- sufficient evidence for homicide, false statements, obstruction.
USA v. Matthew Moore, et al
USA v. Matthew Moore, et al
Fourth Circuit -- US v. Joseph Yengel, Jr.
Being told that there's a grenade somewhere in the house doesn't justify searching a locked closet under an exigent circumstances warrant exception.
US v. Joseph Yengel, Jr.
US v. Joseph Yengel, Jr.
Third Circuit -- Travis Denny v. Paul Schultz
Where there is some evidence leading to a theory of constructive possession, imposing disciplinary measures on an inmate doesn't violate Due Process.
Travis Denny v. Paul Schultz
Travis Denny v. Paul Schultz
Third Circuit -- USA v. Roger Wilson
Appeals waiver does not bar challenge to later-imposed conditions of supervised release.
USA v. Roger Wilson
USA v. Roger Wilson
First Circuit -- Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of Nebraska
Nonparty mortgager has standing to challenge subsequent assignment of note, but strong prudential considerations can counterbalance.
Interposed entity need not hold the beneficial interest -- legal interest suffices for assignment.
Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of Nebraska
Interposed entity need not hold the beneficial interest -- legal interest suffices for assignment.
Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of Nebraska
First Circuit -- US v. Willson
Crim -- Wire fraud, false statements
Sufficient evidence for tacit agreement to conspiracy.
Good faith instruction sufficed for condonation defense.
Deft must actually hold the exculpatory impression for a reasonable interpretation of regulations instruction to be given.
US v. Willson
Sufficient evidence for tacit agreement to conspiracy.
Good faith instruction sufficed for condonation defense.
Deft must actually hold the exculpatory impression for a reasonable interpretation of regulations instruction to be given.
US v. Willson
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Fourth Circuit -- US v. Ryan Holness
Unlike 4A, no exception for offense-specific nature of 6A right to counsel when state and federal charges overlap.
5A violation would be harmless error. (Point raised sua sponte.)
US v. Ryan Holness
5A violation would be harmless error. (Point raised sua sponte.)
US v. Ryan Holness
Third Circuit -- Interstate Outdoor Advertising v. Zoning Board Twp Mt Laurel
Billboard law is not overly extensive, advances substantial interests of the government.
Noncommercial speech challenge TKO'd, as there are alternative channels of communication.
Third Circuit -- Jose Tellado v. Indymac Mtg Ser
Claim against lender in receivership barred -- FDIC beyond reach of statute, administrative appeals not exhausted.
Penalty Order could survive the lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but insufficient due process here.
Jose Tellado v. Indymac Mtg Ser
Penalty Order could survive the lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but insufficient due process here.
Jose Tellado v. Indymac Mtg Ser
Second Circuit -- United States v. Desnoyers
Second Circuit -- Gatt Commc’ns, Inc. v. PMC Associates, L.L.C.
Co-conspirator does not have antitrust standing to file suit based on their subsequent exclusion from the conspiratorial market.
Concurrence: In pari delicto.
Gatt Commc’ns, Inc. v. PMC Associates, L.L.C.
Concurrence: In pari delicto.
Gatt Commc’ns, Inc. v. PMC Associates, L.L.C.
Second Circuit -- Rothstein v. UBS AG
Plaintiffs harmed in Middle East have standing to challenge US bank's transactions with Iran under the Anti-Terrorism Act, but insufficient proximacy of cause to win the action.
Rothstein v. UBS AG
Rothstein v. UBS AG
Second Circuit -- Bailey v. Pataki
Denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment stage for government officials in civil commitment case.
Bailey v. Pataki
Bailey v. Pataki
First Circuit -- Alphas Company, Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc.
Statute's appeal requirements are jurisdictional.
Alphas Company, Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc.
Alphas Company, Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc.
First Circuit -- US v. Maldonado
No denial of right to counsel where court didn't grant incoming potential counsel 30 day stay.
US v. Maldonado
US v. Maldonado
First Circuit -- Juarez v. Select Portfolio Servicing
Pro se petition by attorney challenging home foreclosure states a claim as to whether the bank held the note at the time of foreclosure, but doesn't state a claim for fraud.
Juarez v. Select Portfolio Servicing
Juarez v. Select Portfolio Servicing
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Site Update
Updating as many circuits as possible in the time available each day. Later postings, therefore, for Western and Mountain circuits. Normal service perhaps within a week.
MB
MB
Third Circuit -- SBRMCOA v. Bayside Resort Inc
Claim that action is ultra vires is not subject to arbitration under the contract, as it speaks to formation.
Remand to distinguish condo owners' rights from the condo owners' boards' rights.
Coercion claim (duress) speaks to validity, not formation, and is therefore arbitrable.
SBRMCOA v. Bayside Resort Inc
Remand to distinguish condo owners' rights from the condo owners' boards' rights.
Coercion claim (duress) speaks to validity, not formation, and is therefore arbitrable.
SBRMCOA v. Bayside Resort Inc
Second Circuit -- Ozaltin v. Ozaltin
Federal law creates a private right of action to enforce Hague Convention access rights. Circuit split flagged.
Awards of fees in such cases are discretionary.
Ozaltin v. Ozaltin
Awards of fees in such cases are discretionary.
Ozaltin v. Ozaltin
Second Circuit -- Alphonso v. C.I.R.
As use of the common grounds is allowed to co-op residents as part of their leasehold, they have sufficient property interest to present an issue of material fact as to whether a tax deduction for damage to the property was properly denied.
Alphonso v. C.I.R.
Alphonso v. C.I.R.
First Circuit -- Shafmaster v. US
Tax --
The IRS cannot be equitably estopped on the basis of a preliminary settlement. In this case.
Notice and demand was sufficient under the statute.
Shafmaster v. US
The IRS cannot be equitably estopped on the basis of a preliminary settlement. In this case.
Notice and demand was sufficient under the statute.
Shafmaster v. US
First Circuit -- Casiano-Montanez v. State Insurance Fund Corp.
Stay granted under Pullman abstention, as the Federal Constitutional question has antecedent state property law questions.
Dismissing under Younger abstention was error, as (1) dismissal is thwe wrong remedy under Younger and (2) plaintiffs had initiated the state action, and it was remedial to the same harms.
Casiano-Montanez v. State Insurance Fund Corp.
Dismissing under Younger abstention was error, as (1) dismissal is thwe wrong remedy under Younger and (2) plaintiffs had initiated the state action, and it was remedial to the same harms.
Casiano-Montanez v. State Insurance Fund Corp.
First Circuit -- Zheng v. Holder
No error in Agency refusing to consider foreign government communication not authenticated in manner suggested by US statute. Threat of imprisonment in country of origin not specific enough to justify asylum.
Zheng v. Holder
Zheng v. Holder
First Circuit -- Guaman-Loja v. Holder
Immigration -- harassment in country of origin not severe enough, not state related.
Guaman-Loja v. Holder
Guaman-Loja v. Holder
Monday, February 11, 2013
Limited Service further Limited
Rolling updates for next week. Aim is to have all decisions blurbed within a week of issue, so arguably still a useful resource for the world at large. But very far from the daily rundown of months past. Apologies, reading public.
MB
MB
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Walter Johnson
For purposes of the sentencing predicate, a conviction for selling heroin resulting in death is sufficiently similar to a conviction for selling heroin (not resulting in death).
USA v. Walter Johnson
USA v. Walter Johnson
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Nathan Lumbard
The consent of the victim is not a defense to Aggravated Identity Theft.
Sentence not unreasonable.
USA v. Nathan Lumbard
Sentence not unreasonable.
USA v. Nathan Lumbard
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Michael Deen
Bar on lengthening sentence to achieve rehabilitative goals applies to resentencing after revocation of parole.
USA v. Michael Deen
USA v. Michael Deen
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Sean Howley
Surreptitious cell phone photos met all the elements of trade secret theft.
Trade secret law not unduly vague.
Sentencing court should have considered economic loss -- remand.
USA v. Sean Howley
Trade secret law not unduly vague.
Sentencing court should have considered economic loss -- remand.
USA v. Sean Howley
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Keith Kennedy, et al
No merger of wire fraud and money laundering charges, as the conduct was separated in time.
Willful ignorance jury instruction upheld.
No clear error in Batson proceeding.
No abuse of discretion in denying severance.
USA v. Keith Kennedy, et al
Willful ignorance jury instruction upheld.
No clear error in Batson proceeding.
No abuse of discretion in denying severance.
USA v. Keith Kennedy, et al
Fifth Circuit -- Tina Milton v. TDCJ
Oversensitivity to scent was not a disability under the ADA.
FMLA notice not timely received.
Tina Milton v. TDCJ
FMLA notice not timely received.
Tina Milton v. TDCJ
Fifth Circuit -- In Re: Christopher Sepulvado
As deft could have raised ineffective assistance claims on direct review, a prior holding that ineffective assistance on first collateral review might entitle a deft to federal Habeas review of ineffective assistance at trial doesn't apply.
In Re: Christopher Sepulvado
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.