"Deer in headlights" look justified pat-down.
USA v. Raphael Patton
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Raphael Patton
Seventh Circuit -- Eugene Crane v. Travis Crowell
Citation served on judgment debtor is a lien on their bank accounts under Illinois law.
Eugene Crane v. Travis Crowell
Eugene Crane v. Travis Crowell
Sixth Circuti -- Vision Processing, LLC v. Christie Groves
Methods of proof and claim for pneumoconiosus. (A disease miners get.)
Vision Processing, LLC v. Christie Groves
Vision Processing, LLC v. Christie Groves
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Mark Snarr, et al
Direct appeal of capital sentence -- jury selection; lesser-included offense; aggravating factors; Death Penalty Act unconstitutional; improper exclusion of victim character evidence; funds for investigators.
[Don't kill. MB]
USA v. Mark Snarr, et al
[Don't kill. MB]
USA v. Mark Snarr, et al
Fifth Circuit -- John Brown v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.
Expert testimony insufficiently validated under Daubert. Railway intersection sufficiently clear to justtfy summary judgment.
John Brown v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.
John Brown v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.
Fourth Circuit -- Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson
Prisoner gender reassignment delay/denial sufficiently states a claim.
Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson
Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson
Third Circuit -- Association New Jersey Rifle a v. Governor of the State of New J
As state gun control law regulates, as opposed to prohibits, no preemption by Federal prohibition.
Gun paperwork not so onerous as to imperil lifelibertyproperty.
Association New Jersey Rifle a v. Governor of the State of New J
Gun paperwork not so onerous as to imperil lifelibertyproperty.
Association New Jersey Rifle a v. Governor of the State of New J
Third Circuit -- Randy Mulholland v. Government County of Berks
Rogue caseworker doesn't make county liable under S1983. Procedural & Substantive DP claims.
Randy Mulholland v. Government County of Berks
Randy Mulholland v. Government County of Berks
Third Circuit -- In Re: Diet Drugs
Whether Settlement Agreement barred a subsequent products liability suit. No duty on court to reform Settlement Agreement.
In Re: Diet Drugs
In Re: Diet Drugs
Second Circuit -- McCoy v. United States
Prevailing professional norms for Habeas Ineffective Assistance are those prevailing at the time of the decision. Later changes clarifying the law do not impose a retroactive duty on counsel to revisit his/her decisions.
McCoy v. United States
McCoy v. United States
Second Circuit -- Secrest v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Expert witness in product liability -- sham issue of fact doctrine under Florida law.
Secrest v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Secrest v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Second Circuit -- Kirkendall v. Halliburton, Inc.
ERISA -- where Plan participant reasonably interprets Plan as not requiring administrative exhaustion, participant not required to administratively exhaust. Also a plan-specific holding.
Kirkendall v. Halliburton, Inc.
Kirkendall v. Halliburton, Inc.
Second Circuit -- Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.
Title II of the ADA does not apply to employment discrimination. ADA standards can sometimes necessitate violating state law.
Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.
Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.
Second Circuit -- United States v. Dupree
State court order admissible - not hearsay - as it was offered to show that deft was on notice, not to prove the facts underlying the order. Also a verbal act.
United States v. Dupree
United States v. Dupree
Second Circuit -- Osterweil v. Bartlett
O'Connor pinch-hits, upholding certified question to NY Court of Appeals on handgun restrictions.
Osterweil v. Bartlett
Osterweil v. Bartlett
Second Circuit -- Garcia v. Hartford Police Dep’t
Racial discrimination, 1A rights of public officials -- matters o' public concern vel non.
Garcia v. Hartford Police Dep’t
Garcia v. Hartford Police Dep’t
First Circuit -- US v. Kravetz
Disclosure request for docs in pending criminal case. Sentencing memos are public documents. Other documents, not so much -- special need showing required.
US v. Kravetz
US v. Kravetz
First Circuit -- US v. Figueroa
First Circuit -- Gerald v. University of Puerto Rico
Discrimination -- Title VII, retaliation, discharge, state claims.
Gerald v. University of Puerto Rico
Gerald v. University of Puerto Rico
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Crick rose
To put it mildly. Next update no sooner than Thursday. Onward.
MB
MB
Friday, January 25, 2013
Limited Service continues
Some in-depth, some headlines. Next update Monday PM, if the crick don't rise.
MB
MB
Federal Circuit -- HALL V BED BATH
DC Circuit -- USA v. Kevin Ring
Lawful campaign contributions more probative than prejudicial.
No explicit quid pro quo required for Honest Services.
Expediting visa application sufficient consideration for illegal gratuity statute.
USA v. Kevin Ring
No explicit quid pro quo required for Honest Services.
Expediting visa application sufficient consideration for illegal gratuity statute.
USA v. Kevin Ring
DC Circuit -- A. Farouki v. Petra Intl Banking Corp.
Ongoing loan collection efforts do not toll the statute of limitations.
A. Farouki v. Petra Intl Banking Corp.
A. Farouki v. Petra Intl Banking Corp.
DC Circuit -- Noel Canning v. NLRB
NLRB recess appointments TKO'd. Big news. MB looks forward to reading this one.
Noel Canning v. NLRB
Noel Canning v. NLRB
DC Circuit -- American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
Congressional directive to promote new technology doesn't mean that agency can make overly optimistic predictions.
American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
Eleventh Circuit -- USA v. Michael Jimenez
Misappropriation of funds conviction reversed - gov't agency purchasing book written by the spouse of an employee of the agency doesn't suffice.
USA v. Michael Jimenez
USA v. Michael Jimenez
Eleventh Circuit -- Mark F. Bailey, et al. v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al.
Mortgage note venue selection only binds obligors on the note.
Bank fraud claims too distant from the transaction to be governed by forum selection terms. No equitable estoppel as the bank's involvement was ex ante and at most a but/for cause of the transaction. Insufficient concert for the estoppel claim.
Mark F. Bailey, et al. v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al.
Bank fraud claims too distant from the transaction to be governed by forum selection terms. No equitable estoppel as the bank's involvement was ex ante and at most a but/for cause of the transaction. Insufficient concert for the estoppel claim.
Mark F. Bailey, et al. v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al.
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Smith
Dismissal without prejudice of mistried counts upheld, despite Speedy Trial Act -- Deft argued that 5A rights as to sentencing factors on the un-mistried counts were imperiled, but this comes from the retrial itself, not the violation of the Speedy Trial Act.
No error in including transactions not in the indictment in the Fraud sentencing.
United States v. Smith
No error in including transactions not in the indictment in the Fraud sentencing.
United States v. Smith
Eighth Circuit -- Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
No error in denying claim that worker did not receive COBRA notices, as no prejudice. No fees, either.
Dissent: Yes and yes.
Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
Dissent: Yes and yes.
Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
Fourth Circuit -- Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
Chevron deference to BIA holding that one cannot become a national by simply showing permanent allegiance. Birth or naturalization only.
Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
Fourth Circuit -- In Re: 2703(d) Application
No statutory or common-law right to access 2703(d) orders in a pending investigation.
Concurrence: No common law right at all.
In Re: 2703(d) Application
Concurrence: No common law right at all.
In Re: 2703(d) Application
Fourth Circuit -- Aaron Tobey v. Terri Jones
If you arrest someone at airport screening who has the Fourth Amendment written on his chest, no Qualified Immunity on the First Amendment claim.
Dissent: No one told the dude to take his clothes off.
Aaron Tobey v. Terri Jones
Dissent: No one told the dude to take his clothes off.
Aaron Tobey v. Terri Jones
Fourth Circuit -- John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin
Habeas denied, as state court determination that Petitioner might not have accepted plea deal at center of Ineffective Assistance claim was not unreasonable. Also, offer was too nascent and ill-defined.
John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin
John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin
First Circuit -- US v. Rivera-Orta
Appeal waiver upheld given good colloquy.
Ineffective Assistance shouldn't be raised on direct appeal.
US v. Rivera-Orta
Ineffective Assistance shouldn't be raised on direct appeal.
US v. Rivera-Orta
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Limited Service continues
Still only headlines, but longer ones. Next update quite likely tomorrow PM.
Cheers,
MB
Cheers,
MB
Eleventh Circuit -- St. Joseph Hospital, Augusta, Georgia, Inc., et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
Parol words and deeds insufficient to overcome both lack of writings and a signed letter of intent obligating the parties to make writings before anything becomes binding. K and estoppel claims duly TKO'd.
St. Joseph Hospital, Augusta, Georgia, Inc., et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. McGlothin
No plain error in allowing prior firearms "Incidents" in as more probative than prejudicial.
United States v. McGlothin
United States v. McGlothin
Ninth Circuit -- MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Mutual trade-secret-thievery isn't tied to the same set of facts, so the counterclaim wasn't compulsory.
Copyright prevailing party doesn't have to prove frivolity/bad faith to get fees.
MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Copyright prevailing party doesn't have to prove frivolity/bad faith to get fees.
MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Ninth Circuit -- ANTWION THOMPSON V. D. RUNNEL
Habeas waiver/forfieture of claims --
The AEDPA/Habeas standard of clearly established federal law &c, &c is not a procedural defense but an adjudicative standard. The court can therefore identify that law without reference to the parties' arguments below.
(So held on vacatur reconsideration, incidentally.)
Dissent: State chose to identify another legal standard, and is bound to that choice. Waived is waived.
ANTWION THOMPSON V. D. RUNNEL
The AEDPA/Habeas standard of clearly established federal law &c, &c is not a procedural defense but an adjudicative standard. The court can therefore identify that law without reference to the parties' arguments below.
(So held on vacatur reconsideration, incidentally.)
Dissent: State chose to identify another legal standard, and is bound to that choice. Waived is waived.
ANTWION THOMPSON V. D. RUNNEL
Fourth Circuit -- Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
No abuse of discretion in denying intervention in abortion litigation. State AG is a government agency with the same ultimate objective. And a General, to boot.
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
Third Circuit -- Connelly v. Steel Valley School Dist
State's (or Commonwealth's, as the case may be) setting of teacher salaries based on level of in-state experience upheld under rational basis. Incidental burden on travel, not enough to trigger the test. Scheme looks to place of teaching experience, not place of residency.
Connelly v. Steel Valley School Dist
Connelly v. Steel Valley School Dist
Second Circuit -- Communications Network International, Ltd. V. MCI Worldcom Communications
When not getting the notice required by statute was the movant's fault, District Court erred in extending the time to file.
Communications Network International, Ltd. V. MCI Worldcom Communications
Communications Network International, Ltd. V. MCI Worldcom Communications
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Limited Serice continues
Entirely unreliable headlines only, folks. Next update tomorrow afternoon.
And we thank you for your support.
MB
And we thank you for your support.
MB
Federal Circuit -- SOVERAIN SOFTWARE V NEWEGG
Federal Circuit -- REXNORD INDUSTRIES V KAPPOS
DC Circuit -- Americans for Safe Access v. DEA
Disabled veteran has standing to challenge agency denial of rescheduling of MJ from being a Class One drug. On merits, agency action, while possibly a bummer, dude, was not arbitrary/capricious.
Americans for Safe Access v. DEA
Americans for Safe Access v. DEA
DC Circuit -- TC Ravenswood, LLC v. FERC
DC Circuit -- Sierra Club v. EPA
Challenge to rulemaking under Clean Air Act. Agency, Plaintiff, and Intervenor all asking for different things.
Sierra Club v. EPA
Sierra Club v. EPA
DC Circuit -- Honeywell International, Inc. v. EPA
Eleventh Circuit -- Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Habeas challenge to bench findings of aggrivating factors for capital sentence. Upheld, as the basis for the findings was a jury conviction/recommendation. Aggrivating factors not clearly specified in indictment -- not unconstitutional as a violation of clear Scotus holdings, as there are no clear Scotus holdings.
[thou shalt not kill. -MB]
Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
[thou shalt not kill. -MB]
Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Ninth Circuit -- ALASKA SURVIVAL V. STB
NEPA challenge to STB action -- (1) challenge permitted under ICCTA but (2) agency upheld.
ALASKA SURVIVAL V. STB
ALASKA SURVIVAL V. STB
Eighth Circuit -- John Williams v. United States
Recent SCOTUS holdings on ineffective assistance at the plea stage have not changed the law for purposes of Habeas.
John Williams v. United States
Seventh Circuit -- John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion Co.
State ban on registered offenders' use of social networking sites unconstitutional.
John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion Co.
John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion Co.
Seventh Circuit -- Anthony Smith v. John Wilson
For title VI action, finding that the injury would have occurred even absent the manifest discriminatory actions = judgment for deft.
Anthony Smith v. John Wilson
Anthony Smith v. John Wilson
Seventh Circuit -- Charles Adams v. Raintree Vacation
Brief per curiam denial of en banc with some additional holdings as to facts.
Charles Adams v. Raintree Vacation
Charles Adams v. Raintree Vacation
Fifth Circuit -- Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Dynegy Marketing
Contract did not require counterparty to cover during force majure event.
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Dynegy Marketing
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Dynegy Marketing
Fourth Circuit -- UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
Participants in bond issue have duty to arbitrate under FINRA.
UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
Fourth Circuit -- Dawn Brown v. Town of Cary
Third Circuit -- Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Antitrust -- whether Plaintiff had standing due to injury as participant in relevant market.
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Third Circuit -- Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
The degree to which Federal railrioad legislation preempts state tort claims.
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Second Circuit -- Bakoss v. Lloyds of London
As the FAA doesn't define the term "arbitration," courts should look to federal common law to define the term.
Bakoss v. Lloyds of London
Bakoss v. Lloyds of London
First Circuit -- US v. Flores-Machicote
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Next Update Wednesday
Tuesday's and Wednesday's opinions will be posted on Wednesday afternoon.
MB
MB
Friday, January 18, 2013
New Land Speed Record
Covering last two days -- quick glance summaries. Don't even think about relying on this stuff. We'll get back in the fast lane soon. [/Gratuitous New Dr. Who reference]
MB
MB
Federal Circuit -- STEPHENSON V. OPM
Agency erred in saying that benefit didn't have to be recalculated to account for cessation of SSA payments.
STEPHENSON V. OPM
STEPHENSON V. OPM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.