Eighth Circuit -- AMCO Insurance Company v. Inspired Technologies, Inc.

AMCO Insurance Company v. Inspired Technologies, Inc.

Under Minnesota law, duty-to-defend broadly obligates the insurer to defend any single claim that arguably falls within the scope of coverage - absent specific findings on each claim, a "knowledge of falsehood" exception does not broadly remove duty.

Interrogatory statements can be used for this determination - it is not limited to language of the claim and of the the policy.

No intent needed for violations of the Lanham Act.