Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Ninth Circuit -- USA V. DONGFAN CHUNG

Sufficient evidence for espionage conviction.

No prejudice for Brady claim - the delay wasn't game-changing.

No Confrontation Clause error in not being able to cross gov't official who said the data were sensitive.

No error in introduciton of to-do list found in home.

Correct sentencing categories chosen.


USA V. DONGFAN CHUNG
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.

Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.

Author's SSRN page here.