Deft's admission during the search that he was unemployed, even though not disclosed pretrial, couldn't have swayed the verdict - no plain error in allowing.
Prosc witness calling heroin very dangerous didn't sway the trial.
Acknowledging the validity of the warrant doesn't close the door to prosc introducing CI testimony outside the confrontation clause if the deft is alleging inappropriate targeting in general by law enforcement.
Jury instruction didn't improperly track prosc witness testimony.
No plain error in sentencing.
United States v. Mark Shore