Wednesday, March 06, 2013

Third Circuit -- USA v. Barry Sussman

Federal interest in frozen assets (gold) later illicitly reclaimed was sufficient to make them federal property under the theft statute, as the bank was merely a repository, and the federal agency held a court order giving it ownership of the assets.

Reclaiming the contents of the safe deposit box was obstruction of justice, as it prevented satisfaction of judgment against deft.

Missing transcript sections could not contain material capable of prejudice.

Jury instructions for obstruction, etc were kosher.

USA v. Barry Sussman
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.

Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.

Author's SSRN page here.