Tuesday, April 02, 2013

Second Circuit -- Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Inv. Mgmt. Inc.

To state a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA, circumstantial evidence is sufficient, but there must be enough to raise a reasonable inference of breach of duty -- mere decline in the assets of the Plan is insufficient.

Dissent -- Plausible inference suffices -- no heightened pleading for ERISA


Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Inv. Mgmt. Inc.
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.

Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.

Author's SSRN page here.