Friday, August 26, 2011

Seventh Circuit -- Joseph A. Freda v. CIR

No clear error in funds received as a result of a settlement of a claim for misappropriation of capital assets being taxed as ordinary income as opposed to capital gains.

The settlement was not in lieu of a replacement of appropriated capital.

Nothing in agreement suggested that the payor viewed the deal as compensation for the use of capital assets.  Complaint was for lost profits.

Dissent: Nature and basis of claim is compensation for use of trade secret.


Joseph A. Freda v. CIR
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.

Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.

Author's SSRN page here.