The statute of limitations for trespass accrues upon the first action that would give a reasonably diligent owner notification of the trespass.
Company held easement for purpose X, purpose gradually changed to Y, gov't approved use for Y, X abandoned. Claim accrues with publication of gov't decision.
Repeated intrusions are necessary for continuous trespass - continuing presence of electrical lines insufficient.
Sarah Illig v. Union Electric Company
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Eighth Circuit -- Sarah Illig v. Union Electric Company
Eighth Circuit -- Anantkumar Patel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr
Strong presumption of effective service arises when immigration notifications are sent via certified mail.
Anantkumar Patel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr
Anantkumar Patel v. Eric H. Holder, Jr
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. James Van Elsen
No error in excluding evidence that deft repaid embezzled retirement funds, as intent to permanently deprive is not an element of the crime.
United States v. James Van Elsen
United States v. James Van Elsen
Eighth Circuit -- Donovan New v. United States
Eighth Circuit -- Ali Bazzi v. Tyco Healthcare Group
Dismissed employee's subjective belief of wrongdoing is insufficient to trigger Missouri public policy exception to employment at will.
Ali Bazzi v. Tyco Healthcare Group
Ali Bazzi v. Tyco Healthcare Group
Seventh Circuit -- Gloria Rodas v. Swedishamerican
Where a case is removed for federal court under the Federal Officer statute, defects in the original state court jurisdiction do not become derivative jurisdictional impediments unless they are latent and persistent in the federal action.
Where the federal court could have asserted jurisdiction over the original claim, the removed claim is kosher.
Salaried physicians are covered by the Illinois Good Samaritan Act, despite the fact that no fees are accepted for services.
Gloria Rodas v. Swedishamerican
Where the federal court could have asserted jurisdiction over the original claim, the removed claim is kosher.
Salaried physicians are covered by the Illinois Good Samaritan Act, despite the fact that no fees are accepted for services.
Gloria Rodas v. Swedishamerican
Sixth Circuit -- Golden Living Center-Frankfort v. Sec'y of HHS
Sufficient evidence to warrant administrative penalties for nursing home.
Golden Living Center-Frankfort v. Sec'y of HHS
Golden Living Center-Frankfort v. Sec'y of HHS
Third Circuit -- Laura Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare
Collective (class-ish) action under FLSA is not made moot by a settlement with putative representative prior to certification so long as at least one other person opts-in to the suit prior to certification.
Laura Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare
Laura Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare
Third Circuit -- Mitchell Partners LP v. Irex Corp
Under Pennsylvania law, minority shareholders seeking appraisal may also pursue a breach of fiduciary duty claim.
Dissent: Post-merger, appraisal is the only remedy available.
Mitchell Partners LP v. Irex Corp
Dissent: Post-merger, appraisal is the only remedy available.
Mitchell Partners LP v. Irex Corp
First Circuit -- City Sanitation, LLC v. Allied Waste Services of MA
The right to sue in tort cannot be passed to a secured creditor as proceeds of original collateral.
Not stating the issue in a first-tier bankruptcy appeal waives it for subsequent appeals.
Bankruptcy settlement was within discretion of court.
City Sanitation, LLC v. Allied Waste Services of MA
Not stating the issue in a first-tier bankruptcy appeal waives it for subsequent appeals.
Bankruptcy settlement was within discretion of court.
City Sanitation, LLC v. Allied Waste Services of MA
First Circuit -- Coffill v. Coffill
Summary judgment claiming defective powers of attorney to be scriveners error is inappropriate, as signatory alleges fraud, and therefore reformation (according to signatories' mindset) is problematic.
Coffill v. Coffill
Coffill v. Coffill
First Circuit -- US v. Butler-Acevedo
No abuse of discretion in sentencing court limiting its consideration of deft's history & characteristics to behaviour on supervised release.
Other misc sentencing issues.
US v. Butler-Acevedo
Other misc sentencing issues.
US v. Butler-Acevedo
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Hong
Padilla v. Kentucky is a new rule, but it doesn't apply retroactively to cases on collateral review.
Split with Third Circuit, which recently held it to be an old rule.
United States v. Hong
Split with Third Circuit, which recently held it to be an old rule.
United States v. Hong
Labels:
AEDPA,
Habeas,
Immigration,
Ineffective Assistance
Tenth Circuit -- Sigala v. Bravo
No tolling for habeus petition where deft was informed of proceeding which could result in amended judgment and sentence, but didn't follow up to discover the new judgment and sentence.
Sigala v. Bravo
Sigala v. Bravo
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Acosta-Gallardo
Crim - conviction upheld against several challenges.
[Sorry, TMB running low on time. In the mix: Brady violation, sufficient evidence, morphing indictment.]
United States v. Acosta-Gallardo
[Sorry, TMB running low on time. In the mix: Brady violation, sufficient evidence, morphing indictment.]
United States v. Acosta-Gallardo
Tenth Circuit -- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
No error in holding that BIA can cancel land transfer to tribe where it has valid policy concerns to do so.
Gov't can appeal even where, in the end, it substantially prevails in first action.
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
Gov't can appeal even where, in the end, it substantially prevails in first action.
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Cordery
Ninth Circuit -- BARBEE LYON V. CHASE BANK USA, N.A.
Error in dismissal of state debt collection statute action, as although the statute doesn't protect against efforts to collect false debts, there is no evidence in the record that the plaintiff's debt is false.
Detrimental reliance need not be shown for verdict of actual damages under FCBA.
BARBEE LYON V. CHASE BANK USA, N.A.
Detrimental reliance need not be shown for verdict of actual damages under FCBA.
BARBEE LYON V. CHASE BANK USA, N.A.
Eighth Circuit -- Rick D. Lange v. Inova Capital Funding, LLC
Bankruptcy - no error where preferential transfer was held to be avoidable.
Rick D. Lange v. Inova Capital Funding, LLC
Rick D. Lange v. Inova Capital Funding, LLC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.