Monday, December 17, 2012
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Farr
No error in admission of prior bad acts.
Sufficient evidence for tax charge.
No error in the IRS' seking of civil rather than criminal penalties.
Law of Case doctrine bars Double Jeopardy claim.
United States v. Farr
Tenth Circuit -- Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque
Where Employee Manual says that a certain class of workers is eployed at will and lists grounds for immediately ending their employment, no expectation of employment is created.
No implied expectation either.
Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque
No implied expectation either.
Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Santistevan
Giving police a letter from one's lawyer saying that one does not want to talk to them is sufficient invocation of the right to counsel.
Dissent: Not if you do it silently.
United States v. Santistevan
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. JORGE OLIVA
Knowledge of specific copyright and the forum state of the copyright holder is sufficient purposeful direction to bring claim under the jurisdiction of the long-arm statute of that forum.
USA V. JORGE OLIVA
USA V. JORGE OLIVA
Eighth Circuit -- Super Wings International v. J. Lloyd International, Inc.
Claim of lack of consideration on the contract doesn't prevail, as the performance of the obligation was attempted.
Super Wings International v. J. Lloyd International, Inc.
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Robert Montgomery
Deft's challenge to the PSR was to the actus reus, not the mens rea - the intent alleged can therefore be used to establish the conviction as an ACCA predicate.
Within-guidelines sentence not unreasonable.
United States v. Robert Montgomery
Eighth Circuit -- Randy Russell v. Whirlpool Corp.
Expert who did not apply a particular customary standard is not therefore barred -- the only requirement of the precedent is that where the standard is applied, it should be done correctly.
Expert testimony can derive from the expert's casual observation of the scene.
Where the fridge is the most charred, sufficient evidence for the finder of fact to decide the issue of where the fire started based on res ispa loquitor.
Witnesses' reference to 'the theory' was not a sufficiently improper barred reference to past problems with the device.
Randy Russell v. Whirlpool Corp.
Eighth Circuit -- Shannon Jacks v. Meridian Resource Company
Appeals court has jurisdiction over order of remand to state courts, as remand under local-controversy provision of CAFA is not a divestment of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Federal health plan carriers are not separate entities doing business under a regulatory scheme -- they exercise delegated powers of the government -- removal to federal court is therefore possible under Federal Officer grounds.
Shannon Jacks v. Meridian Resource Company
Seventh Circuit -- Brian Burd v. Gail Sessler
No basis for a S1983 damages claim for lack of access to the prison library absent proof that the underlying appeal was likely to succeed.
Such claim is barred even where no collateral relief is possible if the petitioner earlier had the option of seeking collateral relief and decided not to.
Brian Burd v. Gail Sessler
Sixth Circuit -- Crystal Dixon v. University of Toledo
As Human Resources official was a policymaker speaking on a matter of policy, comments in speech are not protected under 1A.
Vague claims that the institution has too much discretion in the matter are not sufficient to move past summary judgment.
No Equal Protection claim, as no valid comparator.
Crystal Dixon v. University of Toledo
Fourth Circuit -- US v. Kristen Smith
Possible error in allowing expert testify without prior disclosure as to generic alcohol metabolization rates was harmless.
Per se requirment in drunk driving statute does not trigger prosc duty to offer a relation-back testimony to establish inebriation at the time of accident - totality suffices.
No error in denying jury instruction on relation back where proof by totality was possible.
US v. Kristen Smith
Fourth Circuit -- David Evans v. Patrick Baker
(10 page caption. Duke Lacrosse case.)
In a S1983 action, the claim of a police/prosecutor conspiracy does not make the police liable for actions taken after the prosecutor's independent decision to seek an indictment. This decision breaks the causal chain and eliminates proximate cause, giving the police qualified immunity.
Police reliance on nurse' report doesn't DQ the warrant under Franks.
Disinclusion of potentially exculpatory evidence doesn't trigger Franks - no duty to disclose all.
Police defts' omissions in affidavits weren't enough to trigger Franks, so they get QI.
Absent individual claims, no Monell liability.
Governmental endorsement in liability insurance policy means that the purchase of the policy did not forfeit sovereign immunity.
State malicious prosecution tort claim partially prevails.
There is no common law obstruction of justice tort available against a police officer during the course of an investigation.
Court declines to exercise pendant jurisdiction over state constitutional claims - and as the claims are at the stage of motion to dismiss, they're nonfinal for purposes of appeal.
Concurrence: Yep.
Concurrence/Dissent: Would have dismissed state common law claims as well.
David Evans v. Patrick Baker
In a S1983 action, the claim of a police/prosecutor conspiracy does not make the police liable for actions taken after the prosecutor's independent decision to seek an indictment. This decision breaks the causal chain and eliminates proximate cause, giving the police qualified immunity.
Police reliance on nurse' report doesn't DQ the warrant under Franks.
Disinclusion of potentially exculpatory evidence doesn't trigger Franks - no duty to disclose all.
Police defts' omissions in affidavits weren't enough to trigger Franks, so they get QI.
Absent individual claims, no Monell liability.
Governmental endorsement in liability insurance policy means that the purchase of the policy did not forfeit sovereign immunity.
State malicious prosecution tort claim partially prevails.
There is no common law obstruction of justice tort available against a police officer during the course of an investigation.
Court declines to exercise pendant jurisdiction over state constitutional claims - and as the claims are at the stage of motion to dismiss, they're nonfinal for purposes of appeal.
Concurrence: Yep.
Concurrence/Dissent: Would have dismissed state common law claims as well.
David Evans v. Patrick Baker
Labels:
Fourth Amendment,
FRCP,
S1983,
Sovereign Immunity
First Circuit -- Evanston Insurance Company v. Jasmine Company, Inc.
As, depending on the presumption, early comments might or might not have brought the harassment outside of the insurer's duty to defend, cross-motions for Summary Judgment denied.
Evanston Insurance Company v. Jasmine Company, Inc.
First Circuit -- US v. Powers
Evidence that attorney knew of the situation is insufficient on its own to justify an advice-of-counsel instruction where the lawyer doesn't testify.
IRS agents can testify as to ultimate decisions of the factfinder when it's about tax matters.
Trial court imposed reasonable limits to keep other witnesses from giving opinions as to ultimate matters.
Trial court appropriately limited debate on question of document's admission.
US v. Powers
First Circuit -- US v. Burgos
Insufficient evidence that deft willingly joined conspiracy. Remanded with instructions to acquit.
US v. Burgos
First Circuit -- US v. Guadalupe
No sentencing error, as the obstruction of justice bump wasn't a factor int the sentence ultimately awarded (under ACCA).
US v. Guadalupe
US v. Guadalupe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.