Warranty Act requirement of ADR not a jurisdictional bar.
Dissent: Absent exhaustion of FTC claims on warranty mechanism, plaintiff must pursue claim through company's mechanism.
MARIAM MARONYAN V. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., IN
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Ninth Circuit -- MARIAM MARONYAN V. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., IN
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. CRISTOPHER IBARRA-PINO
No error in exclusion of evidence and instruction on duress where deft had reasonable opportunity to notify authorities.
Concurrence in J (K) - Hearsay, anyways.
USA V. CRISTOPHER IBARRA-PINO
Concurrence in J (K) - Hearsay, anyways.
USA V. CRISTOPHER IBARRA-PINO
Ninth Circuit -- ANDREA SHERMAN V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMIS
Exception to bankruptcy discharge ban for securities violation only applies where debtor committed the violation.
Dissent - Not supported by text of statute.
ANDREA SHERMAN V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Dissent - Not supported by text of statute.
ANDREA SHERMAN V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Eighth Circuit -- Ellis Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training LLC
Title VII suit TKO'd by non-pretextual employer justifications.
Ellis Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training LLC
Ellis Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training LLC
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Jamie Smith
Gun + meth in the house = sentencing bump.
District Court did not err in entering money judgment in lieu of unrecoverable forfeit funds.
United States v. Jamie Smith
District Court did not err in entering money judgment in lieu of unrecoverable forfeit funds.
United States v. Jamie Smith
Eighth Circuit -- Cornelius Bennett v. Nucor Corporation
Title VII/S 1981 dismissal upheld.
The District Court did not employ a per se rule in admitting evidence of discrimination against nonparties.
Nonparty affidavits of discrimination against third parties not hearsay.
No error in denial of class of all african-american employees.
No error in summary judgement on S1981 & Title VII disparate impact claims.
Cornelius Bennett v. Nucor Corporation
The District Court did not employ a per se rule in admitting evidence of discrimination against nonparties.
Nonparty affidavits of discrimination against third parties not hearsay.
No error in denial of class of all african-american employees.
No error in summary judgement on S1981 & Title VII disparate impact claims.
Cornelius Bennett v. Nucor Corporation
Seventh Circuit -- Blanca Gomez v. St. Vincent Health
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Donald Kubeczko
Error in court lengthening sentence so that prisoner can receive treatment.
Determinations on fitness for release should generally be made shortly before release.
USA v. Donald Kubeczko
Determinations on fitness for release should generally be made shortly before release.
USA v. Donald Kubeczko
Seventh Circuit -- Meanith Huon v. Johnson & Bell,
District Court's stay under abstention was error - the roughly similar state court proceding does not relieve the federal court of the responsibility for jurisdiction.
(Law firm associate claiming performance evaluations were intentional infliction of emotional distress.)
Meanith Huon v. Johnson & Bell,
(Law firm associate claiming performance evaluations were intentional infliction of emotional distress.)
Meanith Huon v. Johnson & Bell,
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Matthew Scott
Challenge to sentencing bump for defrauding 50+ TKO'd by PSR stipulation that deft defrauded 50+ people.
Note - open question as to whether more than 50 lost money on the deal.
Not substantively unreasonable.
USA v. Matthew Scott
Note - open question as to whether more than 50 lost money on the deal.
Not substantively unreasonable.
USA v. Matthew Scott
Seventh Circuit -- Joseph O'Leary v. Accretive Health
Title VII and S1981 retaliation claims TKO'd on summary judgment, as none of the behaviour observed and reported by the former employee were violations of the Acts.
Performance claims not pretextual.
Joseph O'Leary v. Accretive Health
Performance claims not pretextual.
Joseph O'Leary v. Accretive Health
Seventh Circuit -- Efrain Morales v. Yolande Johnson
No relief on ineffective assistance claim.
No proof proscs used perjured testimony.
Efrain Morales v. Yolande Johnson
No proof proscs used perjured testimony.
Efrain Morales v. Yolande Johnson
Seventh Circuit -- Dakota, Minnesota & v. Wisconsin Dakota, Minnesota & v. Wisconsin
Trade usage of moniker of company to denote its manufacturing plant not sufficiently established.
No trespass, as plaintiff didn't have exclusive right to the rail spur.
Dakota, Minnesota & v. Wisconsin
No trespass, as plaintiff didn't have exclusive right to the rail spur.
Dakota, Minnesota & v. Wisconsin
Seventh Circuit -- Susie Weitzenkamp v. Unum Life
Self-reported illness policy limitation does not apply to fibromyalgia, as it is independently ascertainable.
Lien on SSA proceeds kosher, as it's indirect.
Cross-appeal was illicitly seeking additional grounds of favorable judgment.
Benefits reinstated.
Susie Weitzenkamp v. Unum Life
Lien on SSA proceeds kosher, as it's indirect.
Cross-appeal was illicitly seeking additional grounds of favorable judgment.
Benefits reinstated.
Susie Weitzenkamp v. Unum Life
Sixth Circuit -- Richard Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
Denial of benefits not supported by substantial evidence where views of treating physician are not accorded proper weight.
Richard Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
Richard Cole v. Commissioner of Social Security
Sixth Circuit -- Lala Smith v. Wyeth, Inc.
State law failure-to-warn pharma claims preempted under Pliva.
Name-brand pharma manufacturers not liable for faults of derivative generics.
Lala Smith v. Wyeth, Inc.
Alice Wilson v. Pliva, Inc.
Dennis Morris v. Wyeth, Inc.
Name-brand pharma manufacturers not liable for faults of derivative generics.
Lala Smith v. Wyeth, Inc.
Alice Wilson v. Pliva, Inc.
Dennis Morris v. Wyeth, Inc.
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Donnell Young
No 6A/statutory speedy trial violation. Eleven years from indictment to judgement.
3.5 month voir dire was not attempt to short-circuit statutory clock.
USA v. Donnell Young
3.5 month voir dire was not attempt to short-circuit statutory clock.
USA v. Donnell Young
Third Circuit -- In Re: Lemington Home
Given red flags, old-age home's directors not shielded under business judgement rule.
Whether board members benefited personally is a matter for trial - determines whether the adverse interest exception to in pari delicto applies.
In Re: Lemington Home
Whether board members benefited personally is a matter for trial - determines whether the adverse interest exception to in pari delicto applies.
In Re: Lemington Home
Third Circuit -- Shireesha Reddy Cheruku v. Atty Gen USA
Skidmore-ish deference to BIA finding that staute bars grant of lawful permanent residency.
BIA not estopped by prior representations.
Shireesha Reddy Cheruku v. Atty Gen USA
BIA not estopped by prior representations.
Shireesha Reddy Cheruku v. Atty Gen USA
First Circuit -- Zimmermann v. Epstein Becker and Green, P.C.
Constructive trust cannot claw back payments made to attorneys, et al., prior to beginning of trust.
Statutory claims cannot reach those monies either, given current form of pending class action..
Zimmermann v. Epstein Becker and Green, P.C.
Zimmermann v. BDO Seidman, LLP
Statutory claims cannot reach those monies either, given current form of pending class action..
Zimmermann v. Epstein Becker and Green, P.C.
Zimmermann v. BDO Seidman, LLP
First Circuit -- Portugues-Santana v. Rekomdiv International, Inc.
Jury finding of dolo upheld.
The standard of proof for dolo is vague.
Dolo.
Remand to determine if damages should be offset by other payments.
Portugues-Santana v. Rekomdiv International, Inc.
The standard of proof for dolo is vague.
Dolo.
Remand to determine if damages should be offset by other payments.
Portugues-Santana v. Rekomdiv International, Inc.
First Circuit -- Velazquez-Ortiz v. Vilsack
Title VII discrimination claim not properly exhausted.
Rejection for promotion 8 months after filing suit insufficient proof of retaliation, as no proof that supervisors knew of claim.
No reasonable factfinder would buy the ADEA claim.
Velazquez-Ortiz v. Vilsack
Rejection for promotion 8 months after filing suit insufficient proof of retaliation, as no proof that supervisors knew of claim.
No reasonable factfinder would buy the ADEA claim.
Velazquez-Ortiz v. Vilsack
First Circuit -- US v. Hersom
Statute making it a crime to burn a building whose owners receive federal assistance applies during the entire pendency of the loan, no matter that the final disbursement had been made.
US v. Hersom
US v. Hersom
Second Circuit -- UBS Fin. Servs. Inc. v. West Virginia Univ. Hosps., Inc.
Issuer of securities is a customer under FINRA rules given ancillary elements of transaction, arbitration required.
Validity of forum selection clause a matter for arbitration.
Dissent - FINRA rules might not bind beyond the immediate transaction; injunction barring arbitraiton pending resolution of claim justified.
UBS Fin. Servs. Inc. v. West Virginia Univ. Hosps., Inc.
Validity of forum selection clause a matter for arbitration.
Dissent - FINRA rules might not bind beyond the immediate transaction; injunction barring arbitraiton pending resolution of claim justified.
UBS Fin. Servs. Inc. v. West Virginia Univ. Hosps., Inc.
Labels:
Arbitration,
Contract Interpretation,
FRCP,
Securities
Second Circuit-- United States v. al Kassar
Statute barring conspiracy to kill Americans applies extraterritorially.
Jurisdictional nexus defined by aims of conspiracy.
Entrapment and unproved element challenges rejected.
No outrageous conduct in extended sting operation.
No error in denying pretrial hearing on jurisdictional defenses, as no material facts at issue.
No constitutional or legal error in barring classified evidence of prior good acts.
Conspiracy to acquire SAM's is a crime, since the statute uses the word conspiracy.
Authorization by undercover agents doesn't mean that the arms deal was approved by the US.
Both elements of statutory scienter were in the instructions, though not divided into two parts.
Evidence sufficient unto the conviction.
United States v. al Kassar
Jurisdictional nexus defined by aims of conspiracy.
Entrapment and unproved element challenges rejected.
No outrageous conduct in extended sting operation.
No error in denying pretrial hearing on jurisdictional defenses, as no material facts at issue.
No constitutional or legal error in barring classified evidence of prior good acts.
Conspiracy to acquire SAM's is a crime, since the statute uses the word conspiracy.
Authorization by undercover agents doesn't mean that the arms deal was approved by the US.
Both elements of statutory scienter were in the instructions, though not divided into two parts.
Evidence sufficient unto the conviction.
United States v. al Kassar
Labels:
Conspiracy,
Crim,
FRE,
Jury Instructions,
Sufficient Evidence
Announcement
The management of the site wishes to announce that due to entirely foreseen circumstances, tonight's posts aren't going to happen. Tomorrow's posts will incorporate today's opinions as well as whatever opinions for yesterday that were not posted. The management has absolutely no regret for any inconvenience caused, and is certain to do something like this again quite soon.
Second Circuit -- Amnesty Int’l USA et al. v. Clapper et al.
83 Page denial of en banc, including controlling opinion.
Holding of earlier decision was basically that group had standing for facial challenge to congressional surveillance act because of fear of surveillance and costs incurred in avoiding the possibility.
Amnesty Int’l USA et al. v. Clapper et al.
Holding of earlier decision was basically that group had standing for facial challenge to congressional surveillance act because of fear of surveillance and costs incurred in avoiding the possibility.
Amnesty Int’l USA et al. v. Clapper et al.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.