Rolling updates for next week. Aim is to have all decisions blurbed within a week of issue, so arguably still a useful resource for the world at large. But very far from the daily rundown of months past. Apologies, reading public.
MB
Monday, February 11, 2013
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Walter Johnson
For purposes of the sentencing predicate, a conviction for selling heroin resulting in death is sufficiently similar to a conviction for selling heroin (not resulting in death).
USA v. Walter Johnson
USA v. Walter Johnson
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Nathan Lumbard
The consent of the victim is not a defense to Aggravated Identity Theft.
Sentence not unreasonable.
USA v. Nathan Lumbard
Sentence not unreasonable.
USA v. Nathan Lumbard
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Michael Deen
Bar on lengthening sentence to achieve rehabilitative goals applies to resentencing after revocation of parole.
USA v. Michael Deen
USA v. Michael Deen
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Sean Howley
Surreptitious cell phone photos met all the elements of trade secret theft.
Trade secret law not unduly vague.
Sentencing court should have considered economic loss -- remand.
USA v. Sean Howley
Trade secret law not unduly vague.
Sentencing court should have considered economic loss -- remand.
USA v. Sean Howley
Fifth Circuit -- USA v. Keith Kennedy, et al
No merger of wire fraud and money laundering charges, as the conduct was separated in time.
Willful ignorance jury instruction upheld.
No clear error in Batson proceeding.
No abuse of discretion in denying severance.
USA v. Keith Kennedy, et al
Willful ignorance jury instruction upheld.
No clear error in Batson proceeding.
No abuse of discretion in denying severance.
USA v. Keith Kennedy, et al
Fifth Circuit -- Tina Milton v. TDCJ
Oversensitivity to scent was not a disability under the ADA.
FMLA notice not timely received.
Tina Milton v. TDCJ
FMLA notice not timely received.
Tina Milton v. TDCJ
Fifth Circuit -- In Re: Christopher Sepulvado
As deft could have raised ineffective assistance claims on direct review, a prior holding that ineffective assistance on first collateral review might entitle a deft to federal Habeas review of ineffective assistance at trial doesn't apply.
In Re: Christopher Sepulvado
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.