[PUBLISHED] [Beam, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bye, Circuit Judge
Petition for Review - Immigration. Considering the efforts police made
to arrest and prosecute members of the Shining Path group who attacked
petitioner, the record does not indicate that the government of Peru
condoned the group's actions or demonstrated a complete helplessness to
protect petitioner, and the BIA did not err in finding petitioner had not
established either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future
persecution.
Alejandro Gutierrez-Vidal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Eighth Circuit -- Natasha Dallas v. American General Life
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Insurance. Under Missouri law, payment of a policy'sfirst premium is a condition precedent to the validity of the policy, and the district court did not err in finding that plaintiff's failure to make the first payment voided the policy; plaintiff failed to present a submissible case of estoppel or waiver under Missouri law.
Natasha Dallas v. American General Life
Civil case - Insurance. Under Missouri law, payment of a policy'sfirst premium is a condition precedent to the validity of the policy, and the district court did not err in finding that plaintiff's failure to make the first payment voided the policy; plaintiff failed to present a submissible case of estoppel or waiver under Missouri law.
Natasha Dallas v. American General Life
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Patricia Robertson
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Smith and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and Sentencing. In prosecution charging defendant with misapplying funds belonging to her Tribe's Low Income Home Energy Assistance program, the district court's instructions defining the elements of the offense were not erroneous as they fairly and adequately instructed the jury on the mens rea element of the offense; district court did not err in rejecting defendant's "good faith defense" instruction; there was ample evidence to support a special condition of probation banning alcohol use.
United States v. Patricia Robertson
Criminal case - Criminal law and Sentencing. In prosecution charging defendant with misapplying funds belonging to her Tribe's Low Income Home Energy Assistance program, the district court's instructions defining the elements of the offense were not erroneous as they fairly and adequately instructed the jury on the mens rea element of the offense; district court did not err in rejecting defendant's "good faith defense" instruction; there was ample evidence to support a special condition of probation banning alcohol use.
United States v. Patricia Robertson
Eighth Circuit -- Tarek Al-Birekdar v. Chrysler Group, LLC
Court Summary:
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Wollman, Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Employment Discrimination. Jury instructions submitting plaintiff's claim that Chrysler terminated him in retaliation for a previously filed charge of discrimination with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights were not erroneous; evidence was sufficient to support plaintiff' verdict under the Missouri Human Rights Act's contributing factor standard; evidence was sufficient to support the jury's award of damages; evidence was not sufficient to support a finding that Chrysler acted with an evil motive or deliberate indifference to plaintiff's rights and the court did not err in refusing to submit plaintiff's punitive damages claim to the jury; district court did not err in reducing plaintiff's attorneys' fee request; plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees for time spent on post-trial motions and appellate work remanded for further consideration.
Tarek Al-Birekdar v. Chrysler Group, LLC
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Wollman, Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Employment Discrimination. Jury instructions submitting plaintiff's claim that Chrysler terminated him in retaliation for a previously filed charge of discrimination with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights were not erroneous; evidence was sufficient to support plaintiff' verdict under the Missouri Human Rights Act's contributing factor standard; evidence was sufficient to support the jury's award of damages; evidence was not sufficient to support a finding that Chrysler acted with an evil motive or deliberate indifference to plaintiff's rights and the court did not err in refusing to submit plaintiff's punitive damages claim to the jury; district court did not err in reducing plaintiff's attorneys' fee request; plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees for time spent on post-trial motions and appellate work remanded for further consideration.
Tarek Al-Birekdar v. Chrysler Group, LLC
Sixth Circuit -- Charles Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security
SSA -- ALJ did not weigh opinions of treating physicians (among other things) properly. Remand.
Charles Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security
Charles Gayheart v. Commissioner of Social Security
Sixth Circuit -- Thomas Alfes v. ECMC
FRCP/Bankruptcy -- amendment of claim relates back, as no unfair surprise to adversary.
Thomas Alfes v. ECMC
Thomas Alfes v. ECMC
Fifth Circuit -- Smith Maritime, Inc. v. L/B Kaitlin Eymard
Torts -- as the product injured itself, no liability to the manufacturer.
Smith Maritime, Inc. v. L/B Kaitlin Eymard
Smith Maritime, Inc. v. L/B Kaitlin Eymard
Fourth Circuit -- William MacDonald v. Tim Moose
Virginia anti-sodomy statute falls under facial challenge.
Dissent -- Habeas standard is that there can be no fair-minded disagreement -- state court ruling to contrary entitled to deference.
William MacDonald v. Tim Moose
Dissent -- Habeas standard is that there can be no fair-minded disagreement -- state court ruling to contrary entitled to deference.
William MacDonald v. Tim Moose
Third Circuit -- K. A. v. Pocono Mountain School Distric
First/Fourteenth Amendment -- injunction upheld allowing fifth-grader tio distribute Christmas party invitations. Tinker test.
K. A. v. Pocono Mountain School Distric
K. A. v. Pocono Mountain School Distric
Second Circuit -- Carroll v. County of Monroe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.