Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Returning to normal
Quick summaries today DC, Fed & 112 TK.
Tenth Circuit -- D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partner v. ASC Utah, Inc
Tenth Circuit -- Dill Oil Company, LLC v. Stephens
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. JUAN VIDAL-MENDOZA
Where IJ tells petitioner that he is apparently not eligible for relief, and relief is later available through post-conviciton change in law, no error.
[Check us on this - not sure, quick read.]
USA V. JUAN VIDAL-MENDOZA
[Check us on this - not sure, quick read.]
USA V. JUAN VIDAL-MENDOZA
Ninth Circuit -- JONATHAN GENTRY V. STEPHEN SINCLAIR
Extensive denial of death penalty habeas.
[thou shalt not kill. -MB]
JONATHAN GENTRY V. STEPHEN SINCLAIR
[thou shalt not kill. -MB]
JONATHAN GENTRY V. STEPHEN SINCLAIR
Ninth Circuit -- KAREN WILSON V. CIR
Tax Court can review evidence outside the record.
Dissent - Nope, as it's an APA review.
KAREN WILSON V. CIR
Dissent - Nope, as it's an APA review.
KAREN WILSON V. CIR
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. MATTHEW JENSEN
Sentence for not appearing for sentencing after revocation of supervised release is determined by the underlying crime, not the crime for which supervised release was revoked.
USA V. MATTHEW JENSEN
USA V. MATTHEW JENSEN
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. GARY HARDEMAN
Even where state duty-to-register law is ex post facto, no error in federal conviction for committing crimes while under a duty to register.
USA V. GARY HARDEMAN
USA V. GARY HARDEMAN
Eighth Circuit -- Hallmark Cards v. Janet Murley
Though normally, court must explicitly find bad faith and prejudice before issuing adverse inference instruction, here it was sufficiently plain that the error was harmless.
Lower court erred in putting plaintiff in a better position than they otherwise would have been had deft not breached employment agreement.
Lower court erred in putting plaintiff in a better position than they otherwise would have been had deft not breached employment agreement.
Hallmark Cards v. Janet Murley
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Carlous Lindell Daily
District court can sua sponte recognize plain error that restricts a substantial right and consider it in sentencing.
United States v. Carlous Lindell Daily
Eighth Circuit -- Michael Argenyi v. Creighton University
Eighth Circuit -- Christopher Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc
Fraudulent misrepresentation and estoppel claims not enough to state a claim.
Christopher Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Christopher Grant
Court must provide rationale for (within guidelines) change in sentence at resentencing.
United States v. Christopher Grant
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Raymond Standafer
Eighth Circuit -- James Stickley v. Karl Byrd
Eighth Circuit -- City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
Agency adjudication represents a change in the law for purposes of Rule 60B.
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
Seventh Circuit -- On Command Video Cor v. Samuel Roti
Fraud and veil-piercing issues were independent enough to allow for an appeal after an order resolving only one of them.
As debtor wasn't using the corporate foprm to shield assets in which he had an interest, the veil shall not be pierced.
Creditor was on notice gioven flagged checks.
As debtor wasn't using the corporate foprm to shield assets in which he had an interest, the veil shall not be pierced.
Creditor was on notice gioven flagged checks.
On Command Video Cor v. Samuel Roti |
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Ernest Catchings
Sentencing court erred in including credit cards possibly legitimately opened as part of the fraud.
[Quick summaries today, BTW. Entertainment purposes only, as always.]
USA v. Ernest Catchings
[Quick summaries today, BTW. Entertainment purposes only, as always.]
USA v. Ernest Catchings
Sixth Circuit -- Gillian Miller v. Countrywide
Sixth Circuit -- Djelika Camara v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Immigration -
Court will not review denial of derivative protection from removal.
Djelika Camara v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court will not review denial of derivative protection from removal.
Djelika Camara v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Sixth Circuit -- Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
Sixth Circuit -- Susan Stricker v. Twp. Of Cambridge
Fourth Circuit -- Total Realty Management, LLC v. R. A. North Development, Incorporated
You can't ask for contribution before you're liable on the indemnification.
Total Realty Management, LLC v. R. A. North Development, Incorporated
Total Realty Management, LLC v. R. A. North Development, Incorporated
Third Circuit -- Mandel v. M&Q Packaging Corp
Third Circuit (1/14) -- CMR DN CORP and Marina Towers v. City of Philadelphia
Change in zoning ordinance moots claim based on arbitrariness of ordinance.
No error in denying leave to amend, as the gravamen of the suit was spot-on with the change.
CMR DN CORP and Marina Towers v. City of Philadelphia
No error in denying leave to amend, as the gravamen of the suit was spot-on with the change.
CMR DN CORP and Marina Towers v. City of Philadelphia
Third Circuit -- USA v. Issa Diallo
Intended Loss for purposes of sentencing is not always the limit of the credit card in question.
USA v. Issa Diallo
USA v. Issa Diallo
Third Circuit -- Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel Highland
Proceduaral motion that might or might not have been decided on the merits suffices for a statutory AEDPA toll.
Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel Highland
Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel Highland
Third Circuit -- PG Publishing Co v. Carol Aichele
Press has no First Amendment or Equal Protection right to access polling places.
PG Publishing Co v. Carol Aichele
PG Publishing Co v. Carol Aichele
Second Circuit -- Shabaj v. Holder
District Court does not have jurisdiction under APA or INA to review immigration Admissibility decisions.
Shabaj v. Holder
Shabaj v. Holder
Second Circuit -- USA v. Gomez
No plain error in exclusion of deft's family from the courtroom during voir dire.
No error when defense counsel doesn't formally state that the defense is resting at the close of the case.
Admission of statements from pretrial discussions did not violate proffer agreement or Rule 410.
USA v. Gomez
No error when defense counsel doesn't formally state that the defense is resting at the close of the case.
Admission of statements from pretrial discussions did not violate proffer agreement or Rule 410.
USA v. Gomez
First Circuit -- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Conference
Establishment Clause challenge to HHS funds to sectarian relief group.
Moot, as contract is up, new contract made, and no relief is possible.
Not voluntary cessation, as there was a reason unrelated to the litigation.
Not capable/evading, as the exception is too narrow to capture this case.
American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Conference
Moot, as contract is up, new contract made, and no relief is possible.
Not voluntary cessation, as there was a reason unrelated to the litigation.
Not capable/evading, as the exception is too narrow to capture this case.
American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Conference
First Circuit -- US v. Maryea
No violation of Speedy Trial Act given delays from co-deft.
No error in not oprdering competency evaluation after injury during the trial.
No variance from indictment.
US v. Maryea
No error in not oprdering competency evaluation after injury during the trial.
No variance from indictment.
US v. Maryea
First Circuit -- Latin American Music Co., Inc. v. Media Power Group, Inc.
Copyright challenge
Sufficiency of Evidence claim procedurally defaulted.
Sending issue of ownership top the jury after resolution earlier at summary judgment was not error, as the court treated the question as a live one throughout.
Argument that the earlier court decided case without considering late-submitted evidence does not bar collateral estoppel from binding.
No error in decision on proof of song registration paperwork.
Latin American Music Co., Inc. v. Media Power Group, Inc.
Sufficiency of Evidence claim procedurally defaulted.
Sending issue of ownership top the jury after resolution earlier at summary judgment was not error, as the court treated the question as a live one throughout.
Argument that the earlier court decided case without considering late-submitted evidence does not bar collateral estoppel from binding.
No error in decision on proof of song registration paperwork.
Latin American Music Co., Inc. v. Media Power Group, Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.