Friday's posted on Saturday.
-MB
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Fourth Circuit -- US v. Trino Medina-Campo
Sentencing -- whether solicitation is a qualifying prior for a certain enhancement.
US v. Trino Medina-Campo
US v. Trino Medina-Campo
Federal Circuit -- K-TECH v. TIME WARNER CABLE & DIRECTV [OPINION]
Federal Circuit -- MARIE CONFORTO v. MSPB [OPINION]
Agency correctly held that it did not have jurisdiction over claim, as petitioner did not establish that she was forced to retire.
Dissent: No jurisdiction for Court in mixed-motive cases.
MARIE CONFORTO v. MSPB [OPINION]
Dissent: No jurisdiction for Court in mixed-motive cases.
MARIE CONFORTO v. MSPB [OPINION]
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. MICHAEL BARNES
Parole hearing was sufficiently custodial as to extrinsic matter to trigger Miranda protections.
Agents inappropriately delayed giving the warnings. ("Two-step")
Admission of confession not harmless error.
USA V. MICHAEL BARNES
Agents inappropriately delayed giving the warnings. ("Two-step")
Admission of confession not harmless error.
USA V. MICHAEL BARNES
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. MARIANO ANGUIANO-MORFIN
Jury instruction that translates statutory requirement of willfulness with "voluntary and deliberate" passes muster.
No plain error in prosc. questioning of defense expert witness as to the veracity of deft, given that the expert's conclusions implicated deft's veracity.
USA V. MARIANO ANGUIANO-MORFIN
No plain error in prosc. questioning of defense expert witness as to the veracity of deft, given that the expert's conclusions implicated deft's veracity.
USA V. MARIANO ANGUIANO-MORFIN
Eighth Circuit - -David Heide v. David Juve
Bankruptcy --
After initial agreement, there was no implicit affirmation of solvency and terms with each re-extension of credit sufficient to constitute a fraudulent representation that would except the loan from dischargeability.
The deal made in Vegas to buy used cars was a one-off between the two parties, and therefore a personal debt.
David Heide v. David Juve
After initial agreement, there was no implicit affirmation of solvency and terms with each re-extension of credit sufficient to constitute a fraudulent representation that would except the loan from dischargeability.
The deal made in Vegas to buy used cars was a one-off between the two parties, and therefore a personal debt.
David Heide v. David Juve
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Johnnie Collins
Excessive force during the arrest still not a reason to exclude the evidence in the Seventh Circuit.
USA v. Johnnie Collins
USA v. Johnnie Collins
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Kenneth Rose
Fourth Amendment --
Warrant resulting from an affidavit that omitted the deft's address is valid under the good faith exception.
No error in denial of Franks hearing requested because of inconsistencies in witness statements -- the underlying events have been proven by other evidence.
Pr0n statute still valid under interstate commerce power.
USA v. Kenneth Rose
Warrant resulting from an affidavit that omitted the deft's address is valid under the good faith exception.
No error in denial of Franks hearing requested because of inconsistencies in witness statements -- the underlying events have been proven by other evidence.
Pr0n statute still valid under interstate commerce power.
USA v. Kenneth Rose
First Circuit -- Rocket Learning, Inc. v. Rivera-Sanchez
Qualified immunity for gov't official who issued standards for education providers.
Insufficient proof of bad faith for equal protection challenge to allegedly discriminatory rulemaking.
Relevant certification is not a license, so insufficient property interest for a procedural due process claim.
No commercial free speech claim based on providers' inability to sufficiently tout their products.
Rocket Learning, Inc. v. Rivera-Sanchez
Insufficient proof of bad faith for equal protection challenge to allegedly discriminatory rulemaking.
Relevant certification is not a license, so insufficient property interest for a procedural due process claim.
No commercial free speech claim based on providers' inability to sufficiently tout their products.
Rocket Learning, Inc. v. Rivera-Sanchez
Labels:
Due Process claims,
Equal Protection,
Free Speech,
S1983
First Circuit -- Johnson v. University of Puerto Rico
Discrimination / Title VII
A Ph.D is a facially reasonable and legitimate requirement for a tenure-track position at a university.
Johnson v. University of Puerto Rico
A Ph.D is a facially reasonable and legitimate requirement for a tenure-track position at a university.
Johnson v. University of Puerto Rico
First Circuit -- Woodward v. Emulex Corporation
FRCP -- Age discrimination suit.
Motion to compel was duplicative of information requested elsewhere. Interrogatories similarly properly limited.
No error in quashing of depositions, given lack of notice.
Layoff not pretextual, as the company's limitation of sales in the area was a signal of reduced commerce, not an attempt to minimize the employee's role.
No valid comparators (or "congeners").
Corporate statements not proof of animus.
Woodward v. Emulex Corporation
Motion to compel was duplicative of information requested elsewhere. Interrogatories similarly properly limited.
No error in quashing of depositions, given lack of notice.
Layoff not pretextual, as the company's limitation of sales in the area was a signal of reduced commerce, not an attempt to minimize the employee's role.
No valid comparators (or "congeners").
Corporate statements not proof of animus.
Woodward v. Emulex Corporation
First Circuit -- US v. Whitlow
Offender registration --
Delegation to the AG of rulemaking power on retroactivity was constitutional.
Agency notice-and-comment did not assume the result.
Obligation under the Act to register isn't contingent on the mandate being made retroactive by the registering state.
US v. Whitlow
Delegation to the AG of rulemaking power on retroactivity was constitutional.
Agency notice-and-comment did not assume the result.
Obligation under the Act to register isn't contingent on the mandate being made retroactive by the registering state.
US v. Whitlow
First Circuit -- US v. Zehrung
Sentencing -- trial court insufficiently explained justification for sentencing enhancement based on the deft's official position, given that discretion and control are different things.
US v. Zehrung
US v. Zehrung
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.