Still a few cases in the backlog from the DC Circuit & Federal Circuit last week. TK.
MB
Monday, February 04, 2013
Eleventh Circuit -- Terry Wayne Duckworth v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, et al
Non-ERISA long-term disability benefits should be offset - the question is not whether a program mentioned in the statute in pari materia provides similar benifits, but whether the statute itself is similar.
Terry Wayne Duckworth v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, et al
Terry Wayne Duckworth v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, et al
Eleventh Circuit -- Robin L. Williams, John Duncan Fordham v. USA
Collateral challenge to Honest Services fraud conviction -- Jury could not have used the later-overruled theory to convict, so no cause/prejudice sufficient for Habeas.
Robin L. Williams, John Duncan Fordham v. USA
Robin L. Williams, John Duncan Fordham v. USA
Eleventh Circuit -- Aracelys C. Toro v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
Petitioner has no claim under Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act; no Equal Protection claim as there is a rational basis for the distinction under the statute.
Aracelys C. Toro v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
Aracelys C. Toro v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
Ninth Circuit -- CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSIT V. KEN SALAZAR
Preliminary injunction appellate rulings did not create any law of the case relevant to the merits of final challenge to agency rulings.
Statute does not require a new plan of operations when re-starting closed mine.
No new NEPA filing required -- categorical exclusion applies.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSIT V. KEN SALAZAR
Statute does not require a new plan of operations when re-starting closed mine.
No new NEPA filing required -- categorical exclusion applies.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSIT V. KEN SALAZAR
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Glen Allen
Police had probable cause for Terry stop given the MJ-trafficking patterns observed -- police contention and District Court holding that speeding was the cause notwithstanding.
United States v. Glen Allen
United States v. Glen Allen
Eighth Circuit -- Matt Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
Given variances in the transactions, certifying Dominos delivery drivers as a class to assert their right to the "delivery fee" was erroneous.
Matt Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
Matt Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
Seventh Circuit -- John Rutherford v. Judge & Dolph
Labor -- Where the union is not a necessary party to the suit against the employer, an action by plaintiff against both the union and the employer is not a hybrid action under the LMRA.
CBA had expired before the claim accrued.
John Rutherford v. Judge & Dolph
CBA had expired before the claim accrued.
John Rutherford v. Judge & Dolph
Seventh Circuit -- Pethinaidu Veluchamy v. FDIC
APA claim against FDIC - Corporate barred, as it (1) seeks monetary damages; (2) wasn't administratively exhausted; and (3) challenges actions taken as a regulator, which is not cognizable under the statute.
Pethinaidu Veluchamy v. FDIC
Pethinaidu Veluchamy v. FDIC
Seventh Circuit -- USA v. Eric Schuster
Seventh Circuit -- Aaron Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA
Given complex proposed bifurcation scheme, class/collective de-certification was correct, says Posner.
Aaron Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA
Aaron Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA
Fourth Circuit -- Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. v. Louise Silverman
FINRA arbitration terms do not attach when the deft merely provided counsel on the transaction -- they are not "customers."
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. v. Louise Silverman
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. v. Louise Silverman
Fourth Circuit -- US v. Rodney Williamson
Crim -- Issue is post-indictment, pre-arrest tapings with confidential informant. Scotus remanded, holding that 6A right to counsel had attached on indictment. District court affirmed conviction. CA affirms here.
6A -- Although introduction of the recordings was plain error, it wasn't the kind of plain error that impacts substantial rights.
5A -- No coercion.
No right to counsel in Rule 33 "new evidence" proceedings.
US v. Rodney Williamson
6A -- Although introduction of the recordings was plain error, it wasn't the kind of plain error that impacts substantial rights.
5A -- No coercion.
No right to counsel in Rule 33 "new evidence" proceedings.
US v. Rodney Williamson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.