Some in-depth, some headlines. Next update Monday PM, if the crick don't rise.
MB
Friday, January 25, 2013
Federal Circuit -- HALL V BED BATH
DC Circuit -- USA v. Kevin Ring
Lawful campaign contributions more probative than prejudicial.
No explicit quid pro quo required for Honest Services.
Expediting visa application sufficient consideration for illegal gratuity statute.
USA v. Kevin Ring
No explicit quid pro quo required for Honest Services.
Expediting visa application sufficient consideration for illegal gratuity statute.
USA v. Kevin Ring
DC Circuit -- A. Farouki v. Petra Intl Banking Corp.
Ongoing loan collection efforts do not toll the statute of limitations.
A. Farouki v. Petra Intl Banking Corp.
A. Farouki v. Petra Intl Banking Corp.
DC Circuit -- Noel Canning v. NLRB
NLRB recess appointments TKO'd. Big news. MB looks forward to reading this one.
Noel Canning v. NLRB
Noel Canning v. NLRB
DC Circuit -- American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
Congressional directive to promote new technology doesn't mean that agency can make overly optimistic predictions.
American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
Eleventh Circuit -- USA v. Michael Jimenez
Misappropriation of funds conviction reversed - gov't agency purchasing book written by the spouse of an employee of the agency doesn't suffice.
USA v. Michael Jimenez
USA v. Michael Jimenez
Eleventh Circuit -- Mark F. Bailey, et al. v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al.
Mortgage note venue selection only binds obligors on the note.
Bank fraud claims too distant from the transaction to be governed by forum selection terms. No equitable estoppel as the bank's involvement was ex ante and at most a but/for cause of the transaction. Insufficient concert for the estoppel claim.
Mark F. Bailey, et al. v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al.
Bank fraud claims too distant from the transaction to be governed by forum selection terms. No equitable estoppel as the bank's involvement was ex ante and at most a but/for cause of the transaction. Insufficient concert for the estoppel claim.
Mark F. Bailey, et al. v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al.
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Smith
Dismissal without prejudice of mistried counts upheld, despite Speedy Trial Act -- Deft argued that 5A rights as to sentencing factors on the un-mistried counts were imperiled, but this comes from the retrial itself, not the violation of the Speedy Trial Act.
No error in including transactions not in the indictment in the Fraud sentencing.
United States v. Smith
No error in including transactions not in the indictment in the Fraud sentencing.
United States v. Smith
Eighth Circuit -- Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
No error in denying claim that worker did not receive COBRA notices, as no prejudice. No fees, either.
Dissent: Yes and yes.
Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
Dissent: Yes and yes.
Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
Fourth Circuit -- Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
Chevron deference to BIA holding that one cannot become a national by simply showing permanent allegiance. Birth or naturalization only.
Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
Fourth Circuit -- In Re: 2703(d) Application
No statutory or common-law right to access 2703(d) orders in a pending investigation.
Concurrence: No common law right at all.
In Re: 2703(d) Application
Concurrence: No common law right at all.
In Re: 2703(d) Application
Fourth Circuit -- Aaron Tobey v. Terri Jones
If you arrest someone at airport screening who has the Fourth Amendment written on his chest, no Qualified Immunity on the First Amendment claim.
Dissent: No one told the dude to take his clothes off.
Aaron Tobey v. Terri Jones
Dissent: No one told the dude to take his clothes off.
Aaron Tobey v. Terri Jones
Fourth Circuit -- John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin
Habeas denied, as state court determination that Petitioner might not have accepted plea deal at center of Ineffective Assistance claim was not unreasonable. Also, offer was too nascent and ill-defined.
John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin
John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin
First Circuit -- US v. Rivera-Orta
Appeal waiver upheld given good colloquy.
Ineffective Assistance shouldn't be raised on direct appeal.
US v. Rivera-Orta
Ineffective Assistance shouldn't be raised on direct appeal.
US v. Rivera-Orta
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.