Patent.
ARKEMA INC. v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. [OPINION]
Tuesday, February 05, 2013
DC Circuit -- USA v. Joshua Godoy
Imprecise colloquy TKO's appeal waiver.
Outside of guidelines sentence sufficiently explained.
Restitution from prison labor was not a stated goal of the sentence.
USA v. Joshua Godoy
Outside of guidelines sentence sufficiently explained.
Restitution from prison labor was not a stated goal of the sentence.
USA v. Joshua Godoy
DC Circuit -- Shekita Dyson v. DC
Agency investigation does not equitably toll the Title VII statute of limitations where plaintiff is inactive.
Shekita Dyson v. DC
Shekita Dyson v. DC
Eleventh Circuit -- Janet Feliciano, et al v. City of Miami Beach, et al
Plaintiff's uncorroborated statements can suffice at summary judgment stage for denial of qualified immunity in S1983 action alleging violations of 4A.
Janet Feliciano, et al v. City of Miami Beach, et al
Eleventh Circuit -- Harry Elwood Penney v. Secretary, Department of Correctioins, et al
Untimely motion did not toll the AEDPA one-year clock.
Harry Elwood Penney v. Secretary, Department of Correctioins, et al
Eleventh Circuit -- Jiaren Shi v. U.S. Attorney General
Physical abuse by foreign police was, as a matter of law, persecution.
Jiaren Shi v. U.S. Attorney General
Tenth Circuit -- Hansen v. PT Bank Negara Indonesia
Website of foreign bank not self-authenticating.
No jurisdiction under Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act, as all of the transactions were fraudulent, and therefore, no commercial activity with direct effects.
Hansen v. PT Bank Negara Indonesia
No jurisdiction under Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act, as all of the transactions were fraudulent, and therefore, no commercial activity with direct effects.
Hansen v. PT Bank Negara Indonesia
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. Lor
New impeachment evidence that emerges after 4A suppression hearing is not grounds for a collateral challenge to the verdict, as it speaks neither to the constitutionality of the police conduct nor the guilt/innocence of the deft.
United States v. Lor
United States v. Lor
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
Habeas -- Apprendi did not create clearly established law holding that sentencing factors are subject to double jeopardy restrictions.
USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
Crim --
Diminished mental competency not enough to TKO confession
Jury trial/confrontation waivers were good;
Hearsay in under excited utterance.
Sentence substantively questionable -- terms of lifetime supervision harsh for deft in 20's.
Dissent -- coerced confession
USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
Diminished mental competency not enough to TKO confession
Jury trial/confrontation waivers were good;
Hearsay in under excited utterance.
Sentence substantively questionable -- terms of lifetime supervision harsh for deft in 20's.
Dissent -- coerced confession
USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
Eighth Circuit -- Zachary Smith v. State of Missouri
Despite bankruptcy, state properly took $45 from inmate in compliance with statute authorizing recoupment of costs of incarceration, as the $45 was billed against post-petition costs incurred.
Zachary Smith v. State of Missouri
Zachary Smith v. State of Missouri
Eighth Circuit -- Susan Reindl v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins
ERISA administrator's determination that letter from lawyer was not sufficient administrative appeal is reasonable.
Susan Reindl v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins
Susan Reindl v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins
Eighth Circuit -- Tanya Bosley v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
Petitioner did not give employer sufficient notification of the FMLA leave request; exceptions don't apply.
Tanya Bosley v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
Tanya Bosley v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
Eighth Circuit -- James Trickey v. Kaman Industrial Technologies
Punitive damages award in employment discrimination action does not shock the conscience; hearsay not prejudicial enough to warrant new trial; Rule 59(e) was the wrong motion when seeking to convert fees from lodestar of the forum to lodestar of the law firm.
James Trickey v. Kaman Industrial Technologies
James Trickey v. Kaman Industrial Technologies
Eighth Circuit -- Janet Lundquist v. University of SD Sanford
Where state permits suits against otherwise immune unincorporated partnerships, informal partnerships which are reachable through other statutory grants of jurisdiction (here, school reached through the Board of Regents) can only be reached in that manner.
Janet Lundquist v. University of SD Sanford
Janet Lundquist v. University of SD Sanford
Seventh Circuit -- Robert Farnik v. FDIC
Where plaintiff sues successor bank, but the FDIC as receiver ultimately becomes the deft, FINRA administrative exhaustion requirements for the FDIC suit apply.
Robert Farnik v. FDIC
Robert Farnik v. FDIC
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. Benji Stout
Escape qualifies as a a crime of violence.
Dissent: Maybe for ACCA, but not here.
USA v. Benji Stout
Dissent: Maybe for ACCA, but not here.
USA v. Benji Stout
Third Circuit -- Daniel Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage Services
To rescind loan under TILA, the notice of rescission must be sent within the three-year window. (Timing of suit irrelevant.)
Daniel Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage Services
Daniel Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage Services
Second Circuit -- United States v. Broxmeyer
Dissent from denial of en banc -- 32 years for high school athletics coach's questionable image procurement.
Preceded by lengthy concurrence.
United States v. Broxmeyer
Preceded by lengthy concurrence.
United States v. Broxmeyer
First Circuit -- Silverstrand Investments v. Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Securities -- to survive motion to dismiss, Section 503 claim, there must be a known risk factor impacting present or future interests. And there was.
Silverstrand Investments v. Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Silverstrand Investments v. Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.