MB
First:
| 03/30/2015 | 12-2490P.01A | 12-2490 | US v. Navedo-Ramirez District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan |
| 03/30/2015 | 14-1018P.01A | 14-1018 | AFDI v. MBTA District of Massachusetts, Boston |
| 03/30/2015 | 14-1018P.01A | 14-1289 | AFDI v. MBTA District of Massachusetts, Boston |
| 03/30/2015 | 14-1286P.01A | 14-1286 | US v. Carpenter District of Massachusetts, Boston |
| 03/30/2015 | 14-1450P.01A | 14-1450 | Dutkewych v. Standard Insurance Company District of Massachusetts, Boston |
Second:
Taylor v. Rogich, et al.
Fourth Yesterday:
132003.P Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products v. Von Drehle Corporation
Fifth:
USA v. Cesar de la Cruz
William Speer v. William Stephens, Director
USA v. Jose Pacheco-Alvarado
Moises Mendoza v. William Stephens, Director
Sixth:
USA v. Patrick Winters
Seventh:
| 13-2200 | USA v. David Lockett | criminal | 03/31/2015 | Final Opinion | PerCuriam |
| 13-2234 | USA v. John Tomkins | criminal | 03/30/2015 | Final Opinion | Tinder |
| 14-2592 | Linda Reed v. Columbia St. Mary's Hospital | civil | 03/30/2015 | Final Opinion | Hamilton |
Eighth (Summaries from Circuit):
141123P.pdf 03/31/2015 United States v. Randy Never Misses A Shot U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 14-1123 U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Pierre [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Murphy and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal case. The district court's comments to the prosecution at a sidebar regarding a possible deficiency in its evidence and the court's decision to permit the government to reopen its case-in-chief were not an abuse of the court' discretion and did not prejudice defendant because the jury did not hear the comments and the evidence at that point was, in any event, sufficient to convict defendant on the count; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's convictions for sexual abuse of a minor; the court did not err in rejecting defendant's request for a lesser-included-offense of simple assault; no error in admitting the testimony of six Rule 413 and 414 witnesses as the court concluded the conduct covered by their testimony was similar enough to the conduct charged to prove propensity; even if the admission of six witnesses' testimony raised Rule 403 concerns, any error was harmless in light of the other evidence of propensity; no error in excluding evidence of past sexual assault against a victim under Rule 412.
141929P.pdf 03/30/2015 Streambend Properties II, LLC v. Ivy Tower Minneapolis, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 14-1929
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bye and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act. For the court's
prior opinion in the case see Streambend Props. II, LLC v. Ivy Tower
Mpls., LLC, 451 F. App'x 627 (8th Cir. 2012). District court did not abuse
its discretion by refusing to permit plaintiff to re-add a party whose
prior dismissal on the merits was not challenged in the earlier appeal;
plaintiff's Count alleging violation of Section 1703(a)(2)(A)&(C) did not
satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) because it failed to plead
intentional wrongdoing (scienter) and the district court did not err in
dismissing the Count; Rule 8 governed the Section 1703(a)(2)(B)
allegations in Count I of the complaint, and it was error to dismiss them
for failure to satisfy Rule 9; however, the Count failed to state a
plausible claim and the dismissal is affirmed; no error in refusing to
permit further amendment of the complaint; no error in granting defendant
Commonwealth's motion for summary judgment as there was no evidence it
made any representations or was involved in the sale of property to
plaintiff; the district court did not err in refusing to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims.
Ninth:
| JOSE MARQUEZ CARRILLO V. ERIC HOLDER, JR. | ||||||
| TROAS BARNETT V. DAVID NORMAN | ||||||
| JOHN DOE V. ROBERT AYERS, JR. | ||||||
| USA V. FRANCISCO JIMENEZ-ARZATE | ||||||
| USA V. TODD FRIES |
Tenth today:
- Siloam Springs Hotel v. Century Surety Co. Filed On:March 31, 2015 Docket #: 14-6119 United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma - Oklahoma City Type: Published Opinion
- Greenbaum v. Bailey Filed On:March 31, 2015 Docket #: 13-2176 United States District Court for the District of New Mexico - Albuquerque Type: Published Opinion
Tenth yesterday: Unknown.
Eleventh:
| Richard Moss v. City of Pembroke Pines, et al | 14-11240 | 0:11-cv-62595-WJZ | NEW | 03-31-2015 |
| Carlos Zelaya, et al v. USA | 13-14780 | 0:11-cv-62644-RNS | NEW | 03-30-2015 |
Federal Circuit: