9, 10 & seq tomorrow.
MB
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Eighth Circuit -- Victor Santiago v. Daniel Blair
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-3693
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Beam and Loken, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - qualified immunity. On appeal from denial of qualified immunity, claim of excessive force is remanded to district court for determination whether circumstances support a reliable inference of an unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain; denial of qualified immunity on deliberate indifference claim is reversed; denial of qualified immunity on First Amendment retaliation claim relating to death threats for filing excessive force grievance and relating to placement in cell without personal property, proper bedding, a working sink or working toilet are affirmed; and retaliatory discipline claim fails as a matter of law because some evidence supported disciplinary violation.
Victor Santiago v. Daniel Blair
Civil Case - qualified immunity. On appeal from denial of qualified immunity, claim of excessive force is remanded to district court for determination whether circumstances support a reliable inference of an unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain; denial of qualified immunity on deliberate indifference claim is reversed; denial of qualified immunity on First Amendment retaliation claim relating to death threats for filing excessive force grievance and relating to placement in cell without personal property, proper bedding, a working sink or working toilet are affirmed; and retaliatory discipline claim fails as a matter of law because some evidence supported disciplinary violation.
Victor Santiago v. Daniel Blair
Sixth Circuit -- Carol Smith v. Perkins Board of Education
ADA and IIED -- dismissal of complaint at summary judgment was error.
Carol Smith v. Perkins Board of Education
Carol Smith v. Perkins Board of Education
Sixth Circuit -- USA v. James Gamble
Pr0n restitution payments remanded for showing of proximacy of cause between dfeft conduct and victim harm.
USA v. James Gamble
USA v. James Gamble
Sixth Circuit -- Timothy Pagliara v. Johnston Barton Proctor and Rose
Fraud -- Bald assertions don't sufficiently state a state breach of fiduciary duty claim.
Professional services exception to statute bars statutory claim.
Timothy Pagliara v. Johnston Barton Proctor and Rose
Professional services exception to statute bars statutory claim.
Timothy Pagliara v. Johnston Barton Proctor and Rose
Sixth Circuit -- Yellowbook Inc. v. Steven Brandeberry
Fifth Circuit -- Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
State statutory cap on non-economic damages is kosher under SOP and state constitution, despite the fact that the state supreme court held that the lack of explicit designation of damages as non-economic in the present case meant that the issue wasn't presented.
Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Second Circuit -- NLRB v. Special Touch Home Care Servs., Inc.
Labor law -- employer's individual call-in rule cannot be enforced to make strike no-show an unprotected activity. Home health aides who don't provide notice, however, create an imminent danger and are therefore unprotected.
NLRB v. Special Touch Home Care Servs., Inc.
NLRB v. Special Touch Home Care Servs., Inc.
Second Circuit -- Mark Maraschiello v. City of Buffalo Police Department
Under Title VII, a general overhaul of department-wide promotion criteria is not a race-based adverse action specific enough to survive summary judgment.
Mark Maraschiello v. City of Buffalo Police Department
Mark Maraschiello v. City of Buffalo Police Department
Second Circuit -- Taveras v. UBS AG et al.
ERISA plan fiduciaries should not be accorded presumption of prudence for offering stock in the company, as the Plan didn't explicitly reference it as an option.
Taveras v. UBS AG et al.
Taveras v. UBS AG et al.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.