Monday, August 19, 2013

Thursday, Friday and Monday -- Links Only

First Circuit:

2013/08/1512-1178E.01A12-1178 Portugues-Santana v. Rekomdiv International, Inc.
    District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan
2013/08/1513-1102E.01A13-1102 Khan v. Holder
    Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
2013/08/1611-2479P.01A11-2479 US v. Pabellon-Rodriguez
    District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan
2013/08/1611-2479P.01A11-2492 US v. Carrasquillo-Rodriguez
    District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan
2013/08/1612-1175P.01A12-1175 Gross v. Sun Life Assurance Company of
    District of Massachusetts, Boston
2013/08/1612-2002P.01A12-2002 Garcia-Rubiera v. Fortuno
    District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan
2013/08/1612-2485P.01A12-2485 Demelo v. U.S. Bank National Association
    District of Massachusetts, Boston
2013/08/1612-2523P.01A12-2523 Ballardo Castro v. Holder
    Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
2013/08/1912-1513P.01A12-1513 US v. Diaz-Maldonado
    District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan

Second Circuit:

11-2665-cvIn re: Barclays Bank PLC Security08-19-2013OPN
12-4139-cvBlue Ridge Investments, L.L.C. v. Republic of Argentina08-19-2013OPN
11-5386-cvSimon v. City of New York, et al.08-16-2013OPN
12-2698-cvDongguk University v. Yale University08-15-2013OPN

Third Circuit:

Filed 08/19/13, No. 12-4031
David Bell v. SEPTA
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/19/13, No. 12-2767
Nizar Al-Sharif v. USCIS
USDC for the District of New Jersey

Filed 08/16/13, No. 13-2812
Jeffry Vodenichar v. Halcon Energy Properties Inc
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/15/13, No. 12-1620
Jose Verde-Rodriguez v. Attorney General United States
Agency

Filed 08/15/13, No. 12-1460
USA v. Claudia Marquez Moreno

Fourth Circuit:

134200.U13-42002013/08/15 US v. Judy Lassiter
   
131044.U13-10442013/08/16 Thomas Kulish v. Rite Aid Corporation and Ecker
   
134033.U13-40332013/08/16 US v. Osciel Estrada
   
134157.U13-41572013/08/16 US v. Curtis Davis
   
134043.U13-40432013/08/19 US v. Trevor Reed 

Fifth Circuit:

12-204408/15/2013John Hall, et al v. Variable Annuity Life Ins Co.,






12-307918/15/2013Medco Energi US, L.L.C. v. Sea Robin Pipeline Co.,
12-407508/15/2013Christy Carty v. Texas Dept of Public Safety






12-505348/16/2013Abigail Ransom, et al v. M. Patel Enterprises, Inc
12-508398/16/2013USA v. Juvenal Ambriz




Sixth Circuit:

13a0230p.0612-31972013/08/15 Leslie Ward v. Eric Holder, Jr.
    Board of Immigration Appeals
13a0231p.0612-10272013/08/15 Kindred Nursing Centers East, v. NLRB
    National Labor Relations Board
13a0231p.0612-11742013/08/15 Kindred Nursing Centers East, v. NLRB
    National Labor Relations Board
13a0232p.0612-12312013/08/15 Paul Mendel v. City of Gibraltar
    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit
13a0233p.0612-30692013/08/15 Rockies Express Pipeline, LLC v. 4.895 Acres of Land, More or Less
    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus
13a0229a.0612-53862013/08/15 Jackson Brumley v. Albert Brumley & Sons, Inc.
    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville
13a0230p.0612-31972013/08/15 Leslie Ward v. Eric Holder, Jr.
    Board of Immigration Appeals
13a0231p.0612-10272013/08/15 Kindred Nursing Centers East, v. NLRB
    National Labor Relations Board
13a0231p.0612-11742013/08/15 Kindred Nursing Centers East, v. NLRB
    National Labor Relations Board
13a0232p.0612-12312013/08/15 Paul Mendel v. City of Gibraltar
    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit
13a0233p.0612-30692013/08/15 Rockies Express Pipeline, LLC v. 4.895 Acres of Land, More or Less
    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus
13a0229p.0612-53862013/08/15 Jackson Brumley v. Albert Brumley & Sons, Inc.
    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville
13a0230p.0612-31972013/08/15 Leslie Ward v. Eric Holder, Jr.
    Board of Immigration Appeals
13a0231p.0612-10272013/08/15 Kindred Nursing Centers East, v. NLRB
    National Labor Relations Board
13a0231p.0612-11742013/08/15 Kindred Nursing Centers East, v. NLRB
    National Labor Relations Board
13a0232p.0612-12312013/08/15 Paul Mendel v. City of Gibraltar
    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit
13a0233p.0612-30692013/08/15 Rockies Express Pipeline, LLC v. 4.895 Acres of Land, More or Les
    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus
13a0234p.0611-19592013/08/16 Jerry Vandiver v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids
13a0235p.0612-63492013/08/16 American Bank, FSB v. Cornerstone Community Bank
    Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga
13a0234p.0611-19592013/08/16 Jerry VanDiver v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids
13a0235p.0612-63492013/08/16 American Bank, FSB v. Cornerstone Community Bank
    Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga
13a0236p.0611-57732013/08/16 Martin County Coal Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Ins.
    Eastern District of Kentucky at Pikeville
13a0236p.0611-57932013/08/16 Martin County Coal Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Ins.
    Eastern District of Kentucky at Pikeville
13a0234p.0611-19592013/08/16 Jerry Vandiver v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids
13a0235p.0612-63492013/08/16 American Bank, FSB v. Cornerstone Community Bank
    Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga
13a0236p.0611-57732013/08/16 Martin County Coal Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Ins.
    Eastern District of Kentucky at Pikeville
13a0236p.0611-57932013/08/16 Martin County Coal Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Ins.
    Eastern District of Kentucky at Pikeville

Seventh Circuit:

10-3842Deborah Cooney v.
  Rhonda Casady
civil08/19/2013Final
 Opinion
Tinder
11-1757Deborah Cooney v.
  Rhonda Casady
civil08/19/2013Final
 Opinion
Tinder
12-3121Norman Green, Jr. v.
  Peter Huibregtse
prisoner08/19/2013Final
 Opinion
Easterbrook
08-1641Andrew Obriecht v.
  Brian Foster
prisoner08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Ripple
11-3655Tatsiana Boika v.
  Eric Holder, Jr.
agency08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Hamilton
12-2765USA v.
  Tyrone Kirklin
criminal08/16/2013Order Correcting
 Opinion
PerCuriam
12-3342Westmoreland County Employee R v.
  Robert Parkinson, Jr.
civil08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Wood
12-3571Frey Corporation v.
  City of Peoria, Illinois
civil08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Tinder
12-3726USA v.
  Patrick Evans
criminal08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Wood
12-3768Healix Infusion Therapy, Incor v.
  HHI Infusion Services
civil08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Easterbrook
13-1009James J. Kaufman v.
  Jeffrey Pugh
prisoner08/16/2013Final
 Opinion
Wood
11-1837USA v.
  James A. Simon
criminal08/15/2013Final
 Opinion
Rovner
12-2765USA v.
  Tyrone Kirklin
criminal08/15/2013Final
 Opinion
Williams
12-2969Wisconsin Resources Protection v.
  Flambeau Mining Company
civil08/15/2013Final
 Opinion
Ripple
12-3434Wisconsin Resources Protection v.
  Flambeau Mining Company
civil08/15/2013Final
 Opinion
Ripple


Eighth Circuit:

[ August 19, 2013 ]


121947P.pdf   08/19/2013  Mavis Hartman  v.  Brian Smith
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1947
                          and No:  12-2012
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis    
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author with Melloy and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil Case - Truth in Lending Act. Following a complicated financing 
   transaction to borrow money to finance a house improvement, the Hartmans 
   failed to make scheduled payments toward the contract for deed and the 
   Smiths served a statutory notice of cancellation. The Hartmans sent notice 
   to Prime Security Bank. Prime commenced foreclosure proceedings and the 
   property was sold. The Hartmans brought suit for damages and rescission of 
   all transactions under the Truth in Lending Act and brought state law 
   claims. The district court concluded plaintiffs' notice was sufficient to 
   exercise the TILA statutory right of rescission, granted summary judgment 
   to Prime on the TILA rescission claim, dismissed the damages claims and 
   dismissed the Hartmans as parties. The district court erred in concluding 
   notice was sufficient to exercise the right of rescission under 15 U.S.C. 
   sec. 1635. Noting a split in the circuits, this court joins the 9th and 
   10th Circuits in holding notice is not sufficient. Because plaintiffs 
   failed to file a rescission action prior to the sale, the right of 
   rescission expired upon the sale of the property. The district court 
   properly dismissed the damages claim, the state law claims, and the 
   Hartmans as parties. Judge Melloy concurs in the judgment. 
  
[ August 16, 2013 ]


122835P.pdf   08/16/2013  United States  v.  Abdirahman Mohamed
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2835
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha    
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Any Confrontation Clause violation in 
   admitting an exhibit containing a translation of recorded calls in the 
   absence of testimony from the actual translator was harmless beyond a 
   reasonable doubt given the other evidence in the case; admission of the 
   exhibit, which contained translations of parts of the conversations, did 
   not violate Rule 106 as defendant failed to identify any other portions of 
   the conversations which should have been translated even though he had the 
   entire recording and time to obtain his own translation; permitting an FBI 
   linguist to testify under a pseudonym did not violate defendant's 
   Confrontation Clause rights as his attorney was given the linguist's real 
   name and defendant had the information needed to cross-examine the witness 
   regarding his qualifications and experience; evidence was sufficient to 
   support defendant's conviction for food stamp fraud. 
  
123017P.pdf   08/16/2013  Dale Peterson  v.  City of Florence
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3017
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis    
   [PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bright and Bye, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Zoning. District court did not err in finding the City's 
   zoning scheme was a valid content-neutral, time, place and manner 
   regulation; the zoning scheme was narrowly tailored to serve a substantial 
   government interest and plaintiff had reasonable alternative avenues in 
   which he could operate an adult entertainment business despite the zoning 
   ordinances. 
  
123275P.pdf   08/16/2013  Timmy Jones  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3275
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis    
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, with Gruender, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. The court has jurisdiction to 
   determine whether the district court properly dismissed this case for lack 
   of subject-matter jurisdiction; where plaintiff sued the VA for 
   negligently failing to pay him benefits, resolution of the issue would 
   require the district court to determine whether the VA acted negligently 
   in making its benefits determinations; since judicial review of such 
   decisions is foreclosed by 38 U.S.C. Sec. 511(a), the district court 
   lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and properly dismissed the case. 
  
[ August 15, 2013 ]


123960P.pdf   08/15/2013  United States  v.  Jeremy Stevenson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3960
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport    
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Gruender and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. AOL was not a state actor when it scanned 
   defendant's email for child pornography; defendant did not demonstrate a 
   contested issue of fact warranting a hearing on the issue; district court 
   did not err in quashing defendant subpoena duces tecum to AOL. 
  
Ninth Circuit:

ANNACHAMY V. HOLDER
DAVID HILDES V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS V. RHONDA ROSE
DONALD T. STAPLEY V. PETER R. PESTALOZZI
PRENTISS GRIFFIN V. KELLY HARRINGTON
CHRISTINE BLANTZ V. CDCR
USA V. DAVONYA GRANT
ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE V. EPA
USA V. DEMARIO EDWARDS


Tenth Circuit: (Today's only)

Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 12-2110  Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Nanodetex Corporation
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 11-3282  Pratt v. Petelin
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 12-1096  Cooper v. NCS Pearson, Inc.
Click here to download as an Acrobat PDF 12-6234  Wells v. Astrue

Eleventh Circuit:

Tina Marie Travaglio v. American Express Company, et al.11-152928:10-cv-01311-VMC-AEP08-19-2013NEWview
Don Reinke, et al. v. Darby Bank & trust Co., et al.12-122924:11-cv-00144-WTM-GRS08-16-2013CONview
Harris Baking Company v. Darby Bank & Trust Co, et al.12-123594:11-cv-00171-WTM-GRS08-16-2013CONview
Jim Hunt v. FDIC, et al.12-122974:11-cv-00172-WTM-GRS08-16-2013CONview
Robert M. Osborne, et al. v. FDIC, et al.12-122904:11-cv-00143-WTM-GRS08-16-2013CONview
Stephanie Lindley v. FDIC, et al.12-120154:11-cv-00147-BAE-GRS08-16-2013NEWview
USA v. John L. Yates11-160932:10-cr-00066-JES-SPC-108-16-2013NEWview
USA v. Kenneth Lamar Madden11-143028:11-cr-00012-JDW-AEP-208-16-2013NEWview
Warren Lokey v. FDIC, et al.12-122994:11-cv-00146-WTM-GRS08-16-2013CONview
Clifford A. Zucker, et al. v. FDIC12-1139210-02872-LMI08-15-2013NEWview
Kevin Spencer v. USA10-106763:08-cv-00914-VMC-MCR, 3:06-cr-00349-VMC-MCR-108-15-2013NEWview

DC Circuit:

12-3018USA v. Darren Swangin

2013-08-1913-1044CITITOCHU BUILDING PRODUCTS v. US [OPINION]Precedential
2013-08-1912-1196CITASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES v. US [OPINION]Precedential
2013-08-1913-1044CITITOCHU BUILDING PRODUCTS v. US [ERRATA]Precedential
2013-08-192012-1196CITASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES v. US [ERRATA]Precedential
2013-08-1612-3157MSPBJOSEPH GARGIULO v. DHS [OPINION]Precedential

2013-08-1912-1540DCTUNIVERSITY OF UTAH v. MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT [OPINION]Precedential

2013-08-1513-7014CAVCBIRDEYE MIDDLETON v. SHINSEKI [OPINION]Precedential

Friday, August 16, 2013

Next Post Monday

Thursday, Friday, and Monday's decisions.  Links, at minimum.  Hoping for more.

MB

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Monday - Wednesday (very short-form)

First Circuit:


2013/08/1212-2283P.01A12-2283 Universal Trading & Investment v. Bureau for Representing Ukrain
    District of Massachusetts, Boston
2013/08/1213-1208P.01A13-1208 Urizar-Carrascoza v. Holder, Jr.
    Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
2013/08/1213-1266.01A13-1266 Nansamba v. North Shore Medical Center, In
    District of Massachusetts, Boston
2013/08/1311-2301P.01A11-2301 US v. Pacheco
    District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan
2013/08/1312-2186P.01A12-2186 US v. Gifford
    District Court of New Hampshire, Concord
2013/08/1313-1232P.01A13-1232 Liu v. Holder, Jr.
    Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
2013/08/1412-1710P.01A12-1710 Goat Island South Condominium v. IDC Clambakes, Inc.
    District Court of Rhode Island, Providence

Second Circuit:

11-2325-crUnited States of America v. Corey Davis08-14-2013OPN
12-707-cv (L)Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin08-14-2013OPN
12-4222-crUnited States v. Lynch08-13-2013OPN
12-2905-cvHallock v. Koubek08-13-2013OPN
12-2010-crUnited States v. Moran-Toala08-12-2013OPN
11-5089-agNwozuzu v. Holder08-12-2013OPN
10-1210-cv, 10-1785-cvAbuzaid et al. v. Woodward08-12-2013OPN
11-5165-crUnited States v. Vargas-Cordon08-12-2013OPN

Third Circuit:

Filed 08/14/13, No. 11-1733
USA v. Keenan Quinn
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/13/13, No. 12-3462
USA v. Justin Clark
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/13/13, No. 12-2524
USA v. Craig Finley
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/12/13, No. 12-2711
USA v. Zavkibeg Ashurov
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/12/13, No. 12-2524
USA v. Craig Finley
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed 08/12/13, No. 12-1516
USA v. Durrell Smith
USDC for the District of New Jersey

Filed 08/12/13, No. 11-8079
John Rodriguez v. Natl City Bank
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Fourth Circuit:

126705.P Demetrius Hill v. C.O. Crum (Agee 08/14/2013) 
Published opinion after argument: Reversed and remanded 
Prisoner Civil Rights (WDVA Turk) 

114870.P US v. Jolon Carthorne, Sr. (Keenan 08/13/2013) 
Published opinion after argument: Affirmed 
Criminal (MDNC Osteen) 

Fifth Circuit:

07-700318/13/2013Nelson Gongora v. Rick Thaler, Director
08-511858/13/2013USA v. Anthony Kebodeaux



12-205448/12/2013Bryan Shirley v. Precision Castparts Corp., et al
12-412738/13/2013James Miller, et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L
12-500278/12/2013USA v. Anthony Valdez
12-505178/13/2013USA v. Roger Rouland




Sixth Circuit:

13a0219p.0612-33292013/08/12 Hobert Tackett v. M&G Polymers USA, LLC
    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus
13a0219p.0612-34072013/08/12 Hobert Tackett v. M&G Polymers USA, LLC
    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus
13a0220p.0612-52402013/08/13 USA v. Troy Woodruff
    Western District of Tennessee at Jackson
13a0221p.0612-61142013/08/13 Serge Adamov v. U.S. Bank National Association
    Western District of Kentucky at Louisville
13a0223p.0612-63622013/08/13 William Lindsey v. Pinnacle National Bank
    Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville
13a0224a.0609-50212013/08/14 Henry Hodges v. Stanton Heidle, Warden
    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville
13a0225p.0612-65982013/08/14 The Contributor v. City of Brentwood
    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville
13a0226p.0612-22132013/08/14 James Speet v. Bill Schuette
    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids
13a0227p.0612-26202013/08/14 16630 Southfield Limited Partnership v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit
13a0228p.0612-56352013/08/14 David Cummins v. BIC USA, Inc.
    Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green

Seventh Circuit:

12-2101USA v.
  Harold Rosen
criminal08/14/2013Final
 Opinion
Bauer
12-2339Paul Liles v.
  Macomb County Employees
civil08/14/2013Final
 Opinion
Easterbrook
12-2354Eric Silverman v.
  Motorola, Incorporated
civil08/14/2013Final
 Opinion
Easterbrook
12-1665Maria Pouhova v.
  Eric Holder, Jr.
agency08/13/2013Final
 Opinion
Hamilton
12-2984Brandon Stollings v.
  Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
civil08/13/2013Order Correcting
 Opinion
PerCuriam
11-3449Minor Scott, III v.
  Chuhak & Tecson, PC
civil08/12/2013Order Correcting
 Opinion
PerCuriam
12-2743USA v.
  Franklin Brown
criminal08/12/2013Final
 Opinion
Kanne
12-3204Quincy Neri v.
  Melinda Monroe
civil08/12/2013Final
 Opinion
Easterbrook
13-1002Abdelkader Belbachir v.
  McHenry County, Illinois
civil08/12/2013Final
 Opinion
Posner


Eighth Circuit:

123520P.pdf   08/13/2013  United States  v.  Keith Donnell
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3520
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul    
   [PUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Loken and Bye, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The triggering events in the anticipatory 
   warrant occurred, and the officers could execute the warrant. 

Ninth Circuit:

ALEJANDRO VILLA-ANGUIANO V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR.
USA V. GARY ERMOIAN
USA V. RONALD MOSCHELLA
USA V. FACUNDO ACOSTA-CHAVEZ
A.D. V. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, STATE
USA V. TYMOND PRESTON
ELIZABETH HASKELL V. KAMALA D. HARRIS
USA V. RUDY GARCIA
IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
EDGAR CORDOBA V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR.
TAMER SALAMEH V. TARSADIA HOTEL
JOHN URBINO V. ORKIN SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA,
NO OPINIONS FILED TODAY
Tenth Circuit:

(Nothing published today, Monday and Tuesday unknown.)

Eleventh Circuit:

Xena Investments, Ltd, v. Magnum Fund Management LTD, et al DC Circuit: USA v. David Duvall In Re: Aiken County Federal Circuit: HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS v. SUNBEAM PRODUCTS [OPINION] 11-147701:11-cv-21065-DLG08-14-2013NEWview
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. v. O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD. [OPINION]

LEO PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS v. REA [OPINION]

Friday, August 09, 2013

Thursday and Friday

Second Circuit:

United States v. Brunner  -- Offender must register even after discharge from military.
United States v. Edelman -- Halfway house is "custody" for purposes of escape statute; No expectation of privacy in halfway house.
Ramos v. Racette -- Habeas denied - a brief assignment of counsel during voir dire did not sufficiently violate right to represent oneself.
Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP -- FLSA does not trump arbitration clause; although individual arbitration might not be cost-effective, itr doesn't bar vindication of the right.
Giovanniello v. ALM Media, LLC -- Federal statute of limitations governs claims under consumer protection statute; tolling ceased with the denial of class certification.
Fahs Construction Group, Inc. v. Gray, et al. -- No free speech / equal protection defense against dismissal of state employee, matter was not one of public concern.
Marvel Characters, Inc. v. Kirby -- Mailing of cease-and-desist letter insufficient purposeful availment for personal jurisdiction; parties not indispensable - the action can continue without joinder; expert correctly excluded, as hearsay was the basis for the proffered testimony; IP in question was created as works for hire.
United States v. Rene Rodriguez -- Prosecutor's recital of the mandatory minimum sentence was enough to put defendant on notice; ineffective assistance claim denied.
Hoffler v. Bezio - COA a prerequisite for Habeas appeal; jeopardy attached despite error in swearing of jury; sufficient evidence for retrial.
SEC v. Pentagon Capital Management -- Securities - Late trading scheme violated 10(b)5, 17(a) - sufficient scienter where deliberate; Non-broker status does not shield defts; Error to impose civil penalty jointly and severally; Scotus has held that "Discovery rule" does not toll statute of limitations for securities fraud.

Third Circuit:

USA v. Richard Caraballo-Rodriguez
Marmon Coal Co v. Dir OWCP, US Dept Labor
Dawn Ball v. Famiglio
USA v. Terrell Davis
James Washington v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm

Fifth Circuit:

Juan Ojeda-Calderon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
USA v. Antonio Hughes
Natasha Whitley v. John Hanna, et al

Sixth Circuit:

USA v. Robin Riley, Jr. 
Findlay Truck Line, Inc. v. Central States Southeast and Southwest 
Village of Maineville, Ohio v. Hamilton Township Board of Trustees 
City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel 
Tommy Sharp v. Aker Plant Services Group, Inc 

Seventh Circuit:

Johana Cece v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Dissent)  (Dissent)
Lawrence Ruppert v. Alliant Energy Cash Balance
Paul Hester v. Indiana State Department of Health
Melvin Newman v. Rick Harrington
Wachovia Securities, LLC v.  Loop Corporation
Marica Johnson v. Koppers, Inc.
Bank of America, N.A. v. James Knight
Michael Carter v. Marc Hodge

Eighth Circuit (From site):

122698P.pdf   08/08/2013  William Pilger  v.  William Sweeney
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2698
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport    
   [PUBLISHED] [Phillips, Author, with Loken and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - ERISA. Plaintiffs' claim to recover benefits under 29 U.S.C. 
   Sec. 1132(a)(1)B) was time-barred; ERISA plan booklet contained broad 
   language granting defendants authority to take remedial action, and they 
   could both correct and recoup overpayments; because the plan in question 
   was a defined-benefit plan, plaintiffs could not recover individualized 
   relief in a Sec. 1132(a)(1)(B) claim; claim for relief under Sec. 
   1132(a)(3)(B) was also barred. 
  
122828P.pdf   08/08/2013  Fedja Rochling  v.  Dept. of VA
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2828
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha    
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Administrative Procedure Act. In action claiming the VA 
   violated the APA and plaintiff's substantive and due process rights when 
   it reported a settlement to the National Practitioner Data Bank, the 
   district court did not err in dismissing the procedural due process claim 
   as plaintiff's claim that the report injured him was speculative and 
   conclusory and failed to plead a deprivation of a constitutionally 
   protected interest; the complaint failed to state a claim for a violation 
   of substantive due process; the VA's fact finding procedures were adequate 
   and the district court applied the proper review standard - arbitrary and 
   capricious - rather than de novo review; the district court did not 
   grossly abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's request to supplement 
   the administrative record; the VA's decision in the matter was not 
   arbitrary or capricious, and the district court did not err in granting 
   the VA's motion for summary judgment. 
  
  
122955P.pdf   08/08/2013  Tim Lors  v.  Jim Dean
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2955
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Pierre    
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. Plaintiff's claims for money 
   damages against the State of South Dakota and its employees under Titles I 
   and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act were barred by sovereign 
   immunity; the appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.   
  
123687P.pdf   08/08/2013  United States  v.  Robert Ford
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3687
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls    
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Where the jury acquitted defendant of sexual 
   assault and convicted him of kidnapping, the district court's supplemental 
   instruction validly instructed the jury that it could find Ford guilty to 
   kidnapping despite concluding that he was not guilty of sexual abuse; 
   second supplemental instruction adequately elaborated the "unlawfully 
   seized or detained" element of kidnapping under 18 U.S.C.Sec. 1201(a); 
   evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for kidnapping 
   the victim to prevent her from reporting a sexual assault; the verdicts 
   were not inconsistent as the jury could reasonably belief that the victim 
   wanted to report an assault and defendant prevented her from doing so even 
   if the jury was not persuaded that the government proved all of the 
   elements of the assault beyond a reasonable doubt.
  
136005P.pdf   08/08/2013  Randall Seaver  v.  New Buffalo Auto Sales, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-6005
                          and No:  13-6006
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota - Duluth    
   [PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Saladino and Nail, Bankruptcy Judges] 
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. For the panel's prior opinion in the case, see 
   Seaver v. New Buffalo Auto Sales, 459 B.R. 6 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2011). GMAC 
   had no standing to appeal any violation of the stay by the judgment 
   creditors and its appeal is dismissed; estate suffered no damages from 
   registration of certain judgments and the court did not err in awarding 
   the trustee nothing under Section 550. 
  
136010P.pdf   08/08/2013  Kimberly Hernandez  v.  Dept. of Health & Human Serv.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-6010
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln    
   [PUBLISHED] [Kressel, Author, with Schermer and Shodeen, Bankruptcy 
   Judges] 
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. A debt owed to the Department of Health and 
   Human Services for domestic support was a a debt in the nature of child 
   support under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14A)(B), and the bankruptcy court did not 
   err in allowing the claim filed by the Nebraska DHHS as a priority debt. 

113530P.pdf   08/09/2013  Greg Herden  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3530
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis    
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, for the Court En Banc] 
   Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. In a suit claiming plaintiffs' 
   cattle operations were damaged because of a seed mixture an employee of 
   the U.S. Department of Agriculture directed plaintiffs to use on their 
   property, the district court did not err in concluding the employee's 
   conduct fell within the Federal Tort Claims Act's discretionary function 
   exception. Judge Melloy, with whom Chief Judge Riley and Judge Shepherd 
   join, dissenting. 
  
123417P.pdf   08/09/2013  United States  v.  Jo Anna Bame
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3417
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis    
   [PUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Loken and Bye, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Federal Tax. The district court erred in granting the United 
   States' motion for summary judgment on its claim to recover a tax refund 
   overpayment as there were genuine issues of material fact as to 
   defendant's good faith defense and her entitlement to funds her deceased 
   husband transferred to her in payment of certain debts; on remand, the 
   district court should consider whether unjust enrichment is available to 
   the government in light of the remedies at law which might be available. 

Ninth Circuit:

FORT BELKNAP HOUSING DEPT. V. OFFICE OF PUBLIC AND INDIAN
PHILLIP CORVELLO V. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
USA V. JONATHAN THOMAS
NRDC V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
RANDY CABANTAC V. ERIC HOLDER, JR.

Eleventh Circuit:

Merly Nunez v. Geico General Insurance Company
Joshua Daniel Bishop v. Warden, GDCP

DC Circuit:

In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge

Federal Circuit:

TAURUS IP v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER 
ARIA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. SEQUENOM, INC.



Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.

Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.

Author's SSRN page here.