Still only headlines, but longer ones. Next update quite likely tomorrow PM.
Cheers,
MB
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Eleventh Circuit -- St. Joseph Hospital, Augusta, Georgia, Inc., et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
Parol words and deeds insufficient to overcome both lack of writings and a signed letter of intent obligating the parties to make writings before anything becomes binding. K and estoppel claims duly TKO'd.
St. Joseph Hospital, Augusta, Georgia, Inc., et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
Tenth Circuit -- United States v. McGlothin
No plain error in allowing prior firearms "Incidents" in as more probative than prejudicial.
United States v. McGlothin
United States v. McGlothin
Ninth Circuit -- MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Mutual trade-secret-thievery isn't tied to the same set of facts, so the counterclaim wasn't compulsory.
Copyright prevailing party doesn't have to prove frivolity/bad faith to get fees.
MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Copyright prevailing party doesn't have to prove frivolity/bad faith to get fees.
MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Ninth Circuit -- ANTWION THOMPSON V. D. RUNNEL
Habeas waiver/forfieture of claims --
The AEDPA/Habeas standard of clearly established federal law &c, &c is not a procedural defense but an adjudicative standard. The court can therefore identify that law without reference to the parties' arguments below.
(So held on vacatur reconsideration, incidentally.)
Dissent: State chose to identify another legal standard, and is bound to that choice. Waived is waived.
ANTWION THOMPSON V. D. RUNNEL
The AEDPA/Habeas standard of clearly established federal law &c, &c is not a procedural defense but an adjudicative standard. The court can therefore identify that law without reference to the parties' arguments below.
(So held on vacatur reconsideration, incidentally.)
Dissent: State chose to identify another legal standard, and is bound to that choice. Waived is waived.
ANTWION THOMPSON V. D. RUNNEL
Fourth Circuit -- Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
No abuse of discretion in denying intervention in abortion litigation. State AG is a government agency with the same ultimate objective. And a General, to boot.
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
Third Circuit -- Connelly v. Steel Valley School Dist
State's (or Commonwealth's, as the case may be) setting of teacher salaries based on level of in-state experience upheld under rational basis. Incidental burden on travel, not enough to trigger the test. Scheme looks to place of teaching experience, not place of residency.
Connelly v. Steel Valley School Dist
Connelly v. Steel Valley School Dist
Second Circuit -- Communications Network International, Ltd. V. MCI Worldcom Communications
When not getting the notice required by statute was the movant's fault, District Court erred in extending the time to file.
Communications Network International, Ltd. V. MCI Worldcom Communications
Communications Network International, Ltd. V. MCI Worldcom Communications
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Limited Serice continues
Entirely unreliable headlines only, folks. Next update tomorrow afternoon.
And we thank you for your support.
MB
And we thank you for your support.
MB
Federal Circuit -- SOVERAIN SOFTWARE V NEWEGG
Federal Circuit -- REXNORD INDUSTRIES V KAPPOS
DC Circuit -- Americans for Safe Access v. DEA
Disabled veteran has standing to challenge agency denial of rescheduling of MJ from being a Class One drug. On merits, agency action, while possibly a bummer, dude, was not arbitrary/capricious.
Americans for Safe Access v. DEA
Americans for Safe Access v. DEA
DC Circuit -- TC Ravenswood, LLC v. FERC
DC Circuit -- Sierra Club v. EPA
Challenge to rulemaking under Clean Air Act. Agency, Plaintiff, and Intervenor all asking for different things.
Sierra Club v. EPA
Sierra Club v. EPA
DC Circuit -- Honeywell International, Inc. v. EPA
Eleventh Circuit -- Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Habeas challenge to bench findings of aggrivating factors for capital sentence. Upheld, as the basis for the findings was a jury conviction/recommendation. Aggrivating factors not clearly specified in indictment -- not unconstitutional as a violation of clear Scotus holdings, as there are no clear Scotus holdings.
[thou shalt not kill. -MB]
Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
[thou shalt not kill. -MB]
Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Ninth Circuit -- ALASKA SURVIVAL V. STB
NEPA challenge to STB action -- (1) challenge permitted under ICCTA but (2) agency upheld.
ALASKA SURVIVAL V. STB
ALASKA SURVIVAL V. STB
Eighth Circuit -- John Williams v. United States
Recent SCOTUS holdings on ineffective assistance at the plea stage have not changed the law for purposes of Habeas.
John Williams v. United States
Seventh Circuit -- John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion Co.
State ban on registered offenders' use of social networking sites unconstitutional.
John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion Co.
John Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion Co.
Seventh Circuit -- Anthony Smith v. John Wilson
For title VI action, finding that the injury would have occurred even absent the manifest discriminatory actions = judgment for deft.
Anthony Smith v. John Wilson
Anthony Smith v. John Wilson
Seventh Circuit -- Charles Adams v. Raintree Vacation
Brief per curiam denial of en banc with some additional holdings as to facts.
Charles Adams v. Raintree Vacation
Charles Adams v. Raintree Vacation
Fifth Circuit -- Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Dynegy Marketing
Contract did not require counterparty to cover during force majure event.
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Dynegy Marketing
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Dynegy Marketing
Fourth Circuit -- UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
Participants in bond issue have duty to arbitrate under FINRA.
UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
Fourth Circuit -- Dawn Brown v. Town of Cary
Third Circuit -- Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Antitrust -- whether Plaintiff had standing due to injury as participant in relevant market.
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Third Circuit -- Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
The degree to which Federal railrioad legislation preempts state tort claims.
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Robert Zimmerman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
Second Circuit -- Bakoss v. Lloyds of London
As the FAA doesn't define the term "arbitration," courts should look to federal common law to define the term.
Bakoss v. Lloyds of London
Bakoss v. Lloyds of London
First Circuit -- US v. Flores-Machicote
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Next Update Wednesday
Tuesday's and Wednesday's opinions will be posted on Wednesday afternoon.
MB
MB
Friday, January 18, 2013
New Land Speed Record
Covering last two days -- quick glance summaries. Don't even think about relying on this stuff. We'll get back in the fast lane soon. [/Gratuitous New Dr. Who reference]
MB
MB
Federal Circuit -- STEPHENSON V. OPM
Agency erred in saying that benefit didn't have to be recalculated to account for cessation of SSA payments.
STEPHENSON V. OPM
STEPHENSON V. OPM
Federal Circuit -- MERLIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. NAPOLITANO
Federal Circuit -- ALLFLEX USA V. AVID IDENTIFICATION
50K "Appeal Consideration" payment not enough to make it a live controversy. Ergo moot.
ALLFLEX USA V. AVID IDENTIFICATION
ALLFLEX USA V. AVID IDENTIFICATION
Eleventh Circuit -- United Fire and Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation
District Court should not have excluded all of expert witness' testimony.
United Fire and Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation
United Fire and Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation
Ninth Circuit -- RICHARD HURLES V. CHARLES L. RYAN
Habeas / judicial ethics. When a judge is named in an interlocutory action and files a responsive pleading in that action, state court errs in allowing said judge to impose death penalty.
[Thou shalt not kill. MB]
RICHARD HURLES V. CHARLES L. RYAN
[Thou shalt not kill. MB]
RICHARD HURLES V. CHARLES L. RYAN
Ninth Circuit -- USA V. OSCAR GALLEGOS-GALINDO
Sexual offense a valid Immigration predicate under modified categorical approach.
USA V. OSCAR GALLEGOS-GALINDO
USA V. OSCAR GALLEGOS-GALINDO
Ninth Circuit -- EDWARD FURNACE V. PAUL SULLIVAN
Prisoner claim -- there is a right to be free of pepper spray, there is quite possibly not a right to a vegetarian breakfast.
EDWARD FURNACE V. PAUL SULLIVAN
EDWARD FURNACE V. PAUL SULLIVAN
Ninth Circuit -- JOHN FAULKNER V. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
State claim removed to Federal Court has leave to amend to reach Iqbal threshold.
JOHN FAULKNER V. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
JOHN FAULKNER V. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Eighth Circuit -- United States v. Carlos Ponce
Possession of meth not a lesser included of possession with intent to distribute.
[Party name ensures SCOTUS cert.]
[Party name ensures SCOTUS cert.]
United States v. Carlos Ponce
Seventh Circuit -- Alonzo Suggs v. USA
Whether a Habeas challenge filed after one collateral challenge that resulted in resentencing is second/successive if it only challenges underlying conviction.
Alonzo Suggs v. USA
Alonzo Suggs v. USA
Fifth Circuit -- ?
Range of opinions show as posted yesterday, but they look like they've all already been issued.
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/Opinions.aspx?View=Last7
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/Opinions.aspx?View=Last7
Fourth Circuit -- US v. Antwan Jackson
Confrontation Clause exception for when deft makes the witness unavailable doesn't require that witness unavailability be the sole motive of deft's actions.
US v. Antwan Jackson
US v. Antwan Jackson
Fourth Circuit -- Center for Individual Freedom v. Natalie H. Tennant
1A challenge to state Campaign Finance statutes.
Center for Individual Freedom v. Natalie H. Tennant
Center for Individual Freedom v. Natalie H. Tennant
Second Circuit -- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
No colateral jurisdiction over District Court discovery orders under Alien Tort Claims Act and Anti-Terrorism Act, Mandamus will not issue.
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
Second Circuit -- Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Bd.
New 2 Cir. test for whether there is a duty to bargain over certain terms referenced by CBA.
Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Bd.
Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Bd.
First Circuit -- US v. Armstrong
Whether 2A bars certain offenses from being valid predicate for sentencing purposes.
US v. Armstrong
US v. Armstrong
First Circuit -- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
First Circuit -- Boston Gas Company v. Century Indemnity Company
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Abridged Service Continues
Quick headlines only today. As always, entertainment purposes only.
Cheers,
MB
Cheers,
MB
Federal Circuit -- W.C. V HHS [OPINION]
Temporal proximity insufficient for causation for claim under Vaccine Act.
Aggravation of condition claim linked to causation analysis for symptoms.
W.C. V HHS [OPINION]
Aggravation of condition claim linked to causation analysis for symptoms.
W.C. V HHS [OPINION]
DC Circuit -- American Road & Transportation v. EPA (1/15)
Challenge to EPA rules time-barred under 60 day Clean Air Act clock.
American Road & Transportation v. EPA
American Road & Transportation v. EPA
DC Circuit -- William Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hartman (1/15)
Qualified immunity still good, as although lack of probable cause might arguably not have been an element in retaliatory prosecution claims in the Tenth, it was in DC.
Dissent: 1A law vague on this generally.
William Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hartman
Dissent: 1A law vague on this generally.
William Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hartman
DC Circuit -- Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. EPA (1/15)
Dissent from denial of en banc -- food producers and petroleum producers are both within the zone of interests for Ethanol legislation.
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. EPA
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. EPA
DC Circuit -- EchoStar Satellite, LLC v. FCC (1/15)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics (DO NOT RELY ON THIS)
Sentencing
(334)
FRCP
(298)
Administrative Law
(230)
Crim
(219)
FRE
(141)
Immigration
(141)
Fourth Amendment
(129)
S1983
(128)
Discrimination
(117)
Contract Interpretation
(113)
Habeas
(113)
Labor/Employment
(91)
Intellectual Property
(89)
Bankruptcy
(86)
Prisoner Litigation
(80)
Ineffective Assistance
(67)
Free Speech
(62)
Jury Instructions
(60)
AEDPA
(59)
Class Actions
(53)
Legal Ethics
(52)
Standing
(51)
Errata
(49)
Sufficient Evidence
(49)
ERISA
(46)
Tax
(46)
Torts - General
(45)
Securities
(43)
FRCrimP
(41)
Arbitration
(39)
Circuit Split
(39)
Conflict of laws
(38)
Statute of Limitations
(35)
Fees
(34)
Poz
(32)
Due Process claims
(31)
Conspiracy
(30)
Miranda
(28)
Announcements
(27)
Preemption
(27)
International Law
(26)
Sovereign Immunity
(26)
Religion
(24)
Communications /Computers
(21)
Jury Selection
(19)
ACCA
(18)
Environmental
(18)
Equal Protection
(18)
Guns
(18)
Short Form
(18)
Antitrust
(15)
General/Specific Jurisdiction
(15)
Speedy Trial
(15)
Commerce Clause
(14)
Brady
(13)
Souter
(12)
Double Jeopardy
(11)
SSA
(11)
Tribe Law
(11)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
(10)
Mootness
(10)
Takings
(10)
White Collar
(10)
Election Law
(9)
Collateral Estoppel
(7)
ADA
(5)
Abstention
(5)
IDEA
(5)
Koz
(5)
Military
(4)
RICO
(4)
FCRA
(3)
Res Judicata
(3)
Board Law
(2)
Excessive Force
(2)
Obstruction
(2)
Patent
(2)
The Fifth
(2)
UCC
(2)
Abortion
(1)
Bail
(1)
Cert
(1)
DNA
(1)
FDCPA
(1)
Public Trial
(1)
Compiled by D.E. Frydrychowski, who is, not incidentally, not giving you legal advice.
Category tags above are sporadically maintained Do not rely. Do not rely. Do not rely.
Author's SSRN page here.