Eighth Circuit -- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pella Corporation

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pella Corporation

Mother of 7, 2 of which suffer from autism seeking discharge of 300K in student debt.

No error in consideration of recent past when evaluating undue hardship for discharge of student loans.

Possible error in double-counting methodology harmless error.

Special concurrence - they have an expensive car, but ECMC stipulated to odd income levels, so no remedy.