Florentino Meza v. Intelligent Mexican Marketing,
Seventh:
USA v. Robert Loffredi
Robert Yeftich v. Navistar, Inc.
Eighth (From site):
121797P.pdf 06/18/2013 Donna Floyd-Gimon v. University of Arkansas
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1797
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
[PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Wollman and Gruender,
Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - civil rights. District court's grant of
summary judgment in civil rights action alleging violations of due process
and equal protection relating to termination for gross misconduct is
affirmed. Due process claims failed because employee received all the
process she was due; the failure to provide specific examples of altered
records does not rise to the level of a due process violation. Claim that
employee was deprived of a liberty interest in her reputation without due
process failed because employee did not sufficiently, if at all, request a
name-clearing hearing. District court did not err in finding employee
failed to show direct evidence of gender discrimination and correctly
concluded employee did not show the defendants' explanation for terminating
her was a pretext for gender discrimination; the comparators were not
similarly situated.
122654P.pdf 06/18/2013 Jenny Evance v. Trumann Health Services
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-2654
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro
[PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Bright and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - employment discrimination. Appeal is limited
to review of summary judgment as that was only order designated in the
notice of appeal. District court correctly granted summary judgment on
discrimination claims, as there was no direct evidence of discrimination
and employer articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for
termination and Evance did not show other similarly situated employees were
treated more favorably. District court properly granted summary judgment on
defamation claims, as there was no evidence to support she was defamed by
falsely stating she initiated improper conduct with resident.
123766P.pdf 06/18/2013 William Dimercurio v. Deidre Malcom
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3766
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Arnold, Author, with Gruender and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - Rule 41(b) dismissals. After district court
rescheduled trial, denied plaintiff's motion for continuance of retrial
date, and denied motion for reconsideration, the district court dismissed
the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute the appeal on the trial
date. District court abused its discretion in denying the continuance and
erred in dismissing the case with prejudice. The dismissal with prejudice
is reversed and the case remanded.
Ninth:
| USA V. MARK AVERY | |||||
| PEDRO TAMAYO-TAMAYO V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR. | |||||
| ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA V. COUNTY OF MARICOPA | |||||
| USA V. VICTOR GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ |
DC:
11-5344Abdul Al Qader Hussain v. Barack Obama
06/18/2013
11-5353In Re: Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing
06/18/2013
12-5032Jefferson Morley v. CIA
06/18/2013